scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Organisation of services for people with cardiovascular disorders in primary care: transfer to primary care or to specialist-generalist multidisciplinary teams?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Current research supports the idea of the management of certain chronic health conditions in primary care based on the integration of GPs and specialists into multidisciplinary teams, based on availability of reliable evidence about cost-effectiveness, health care outcomes, patient preference and incentives for GPs.
Abstract
An ageing population and high levels of multimorbidity increase rates of GP and specialist consultations. Constraints on health care funding are leading to additional pressure for the adoption of safe and cost-effective alternatives to specialist care, in some cases by shifting services to primary care. In this paper we argue, having searched for evidence on approaches to shifting care for some people with cardiovascular problems from secondary to primary care, that a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach is required to achieve high quality outcomes from cardiovascular care in the primary care setting. Simply transferring patients from specialist care to management by primary care teams is likely to lead to worse outcomes than services that involve both specialists and primary care teams together, in planned and effectively managed systems of care. The care of patients with certain chronic conditions in the community, if appropriately organised, can achieve the same health outcomes as ambulatory care by hospital specialists. However, shared care by GPs and specialists for patients with chronic heart failure after discharge from hospital can deliver better patient survival. The existing models of shared care include specialists working in an ambulatory care setting (in Central and Eastern Europe) or in hospital based outreach clinics, and cardiology care organised by GPs in the UK and Australia, which have demonstrated reductions in referral rates. Current research supports the idea of the management of certain chronic health conditions in primary care based on the integration of GPs and specialists into multidisciplinary teams, based on availability of reliable evidence about cost-effectiveness, health care outcomes, patient preference and incentives for GPs. Evaluation of such schemes is mandatory, however, to ensure that the expected benefits do materialise.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book

Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy

TL;DR: This chapter discusses the elements of primary care in the United States, as well as issues in primary care, including organization, financing, and access to services.
Journal ArticleDOI

Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy

Carol D. Berkowitz
- 01 Feb 1994 - 
TL;DR: Dr Starfield, in this well-written and easily readable book, objectively reviews the concept of primary care in its entirety and constructs the argument for primary care starting with a historical review.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multimorbidity in chronic disease: impact on health care resources and costs.

TL;DR: A synthesis of literature examining multimorbidity and resource utilization, including implications for cost-effectiveness estimates and resource allocation decision making is provided to provide valuable insight into the potential positive and cost-effective impact that interventions may have among patients with multiple comorbidities.

Multimorbidity in chronic disease: Impact on health care resources and costs

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a synthesis of literature examining multimorbidity and resource utilization, including implications for cost-effectiveness estimates and resource allocation decision making, and highlight the pragmatic and methodological challenges underlying the conduct of economic evaluations among people who may have advanced age, frailty, and disadvantageous socioeconomic circumstances, and where long-term follow-up may be required to directly observe sustained and measurable health and quality of life benefits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review.

TL;DR: The examples of integrated working provide insights into problems and solutions around interorganisational and interprofessional working that will guide those planning integration in the future.
References
More filters
Journal Article

A randomised controlled trial of joint consultations with general practitioners and cardiologists in primary care.

TL;DR: Joint consultation is an effective method that provides a quality of care that at least equals usual care and that contributes to a better selection of patients who need specialist care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Referral rates and waiting lists: some empirical evidence.

TL;DR: A version of the demand function used in this model is estimated, with panel data for Scottish Health Board Areas during the period 1990-1992, for each of six broadly defined 'waiting list' specialisms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Attitudes to clinical guidelines—do GPs differ from other medical doctors?

TL;DR: It is suggested that creating trust in guidelines could be more important than more efforts to improve guideline format and accessibility and it may also be worth considering whether guidelines should be implemented using different processes in generalist and specialist care.
Journal Article

GPs with special interests - impacting on complex diabetes care.

TL;DR: A futuristic, integrated community/specialist model, delivered within a general practice setting, can deliver significant gains for Australians who have complex type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Journal ArticleDOI

General practitioners with special clinical interests

Rebecca Rosen, +2 more
- 28 Aug 2003 - 
TL;DR: The NHS Plan called for the introduction of 1000 “specialist general practitioners” to establish clinics in community settings for carefully selected patients to improve access in specialties that have particularly long waiting times, such as otorhinolaryngology, dermatology, and ophthalmology.
Related Papers (5)