scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Phase II studies: which is worse, false positive or false negative?

Andre Rogatko, +1 more
- 03 Apr 1996 - 
- Vol. 88, Iss: 7, pp 462-462
About
This article is published in Journal of the National Cancer Institute.The article was published on 1996-04-03. It has received 11 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: False positive paradox & False Negative Reactions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Content and Quality of Currently Published Phase II Cancer Trials

TL;DR: The quality of the statistical component of published phase II cancer trials is generally poor and raises suspicion that low quality is likely to bias study findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with biweekly high-dose gemcitabine.

TL;DR: In view of the disappointing treatment results, gemcitabine using this particular dose regimen should not be considered for further investigation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Whole-Brain N-Acetylaspartate Measurement: Evidence for Different Clinical Cohorts—Initial Observations

TL;DR: Ascertaining an individual's NAA concentration dynamics might enable early forecast of disease course, reflect disease severity and thus influence treatment decisions, and improve clinical trial efficiency by allowing selection of candidates on the basis of WBNAA dynamics in addition to clinical status.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin.

TL;DR: The limited diagnostic evaluation used in this study identified patients with treatable malignancies and increased the survival duration of a population of suspected UPT patients.