scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Power in international politics

Michael Barnett, +1 more
- 01 Jan 2005 - 
- Vol. 59, Iss: 01, pp 39-75
TLDR
The authors argue that scholars of international relations should employ multiple conceptions of power and develop a conceptual framework that encourages rigorous attention to power in its different forms, and illustrate how attention to the multiple forms of power matters for the analysis of global governance and American empire.
Abstract
The concept of power is central to international relations. Yet disciplin- ary discussions tend to privilege only one, albeit important, form: an actor control- ling another to do what that other would not otherwise do. By showing conceptual favoritism, the discipline not only overlooks the different forms of power in inter- national politics, but also fails to develop sophisticated understandings of how global outcomes are produced and how actors are differentially enabled and constrained to determine their fates. We argue that scholars of international relations should employ multiple conceptions of power and develop a conceptual framework that encourages rigorous attention to power in its different forms. We first begin by producing a tax- onomy of power. Power is the production, in and through social relations, of effects that shape the capacities of actors to determine their circumstances and fate. This general concept entails two crucial, analytical dimensions: the kinds of social rela- tions through which power works (in relations of interaction or in social relations of constitution); and the specificity of social relations through which effects are pro- duced (specific/direct or diffuse/indirect). These distinctions generate our taxonomy and four concepts of power: compulsory, institutional, structural, and productive. We then illustrate how attention to the multiple forms of power matters for the analysis of global governance and American empire. We conclude by urging scholars to beware of the idea that the multiple concepts are competing, and instead to see connections between them in order to generate more robust understandings of how power works in international politics.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development as Freedom

Journal ArticleDOI

Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations

TL;DR: In this article, a multilevel theoretical model is proposed to understand why business organizations are increasingly engaging in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and thereby exhibiting the potential to exert positive social change.
Journal Article

The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

Donald F. Gentles
- 01 Nov 2002 - 
Book ChapterDOI

Power in global governance

TL;DR: The notion of knowledge in power has been studied in the context of global governance as discussed by the authors. But it has not yet been explored in the field of policing and global governance, as discussed in this paper.
References
More filters
Book

Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity

Judith Butler
TL;DR: The body politics of Julia Kristeva and the Body Politics of JuliaKristeva as mentioned in this paper are discussed in detail in Section 5.1.1 and Section 6.2.1.
Book

Development as Freedom

Amartya Sen
TL;DR: In this paper, Amartya Sen quotes the eighteenth century poet William Cowper on freedom: Freedom has a thousand charms to show, That slaves howe'er contented, never know.
Book

Exchange and Power in Social Life

Peter M. Blau
TL;DR: In a seminal work as discussed by the authors, Peter M. Blau used concepts of exchange, reciprocity, imbalance, and power to examine social life and to derive the more complex processes in social structure from the simpler ones.
Trending Questions (1)
What are the different dimensions of power in international realtions?

The paper discusses four dimensions of power in international relations: compulsory power, institutional power, structural power, and productive power.