Publication bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes?
TLDR
In this article , the authors identified and included all RCTs published from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2021 in the two journals with the highest impact factors (Clarivate Analytics, 2020) from each of the following domains: Periodontology, Endodontics, Restorative Dentistry/ Prosthodontics and Orthodontic, Paediatric Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.About:
This article is published in Journal of Dentistry.The article was published on 2022-06-01 and is currently open access. It has received 2 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Medicine & Periodontology.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Scoping reviews in orthodontics: are they justified?
Filippos Mikelis,Despina Koletsi +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors identify and record the proportion of scope reviews in orthodontics that have been clearly and adequately justified, based on the methodological framework of such types of reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting characteristics of nonsurgical periodontal therapy trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: an observational study.
TL;DR: In this article , the authors evaluated the completeness of the description of nonsurgical periodontal therapy interventions in clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and correspondence of registered information for trial participants and outcome measures with published articles.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
TL;DR: Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.
Journal ArticleDOI
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.
TL;DR: Publication bias is the tendency on the part of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings.
Journal ArticleDOI
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
TL;DR: That meta-analysis holds potential problems can be illustrated by contrasting the conclusions of two meta-analyses comparing low molecular weight heparins and standard heparin in the prevention of thrombosis after surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Catherine D. DeAngelis,Jeffrey M. Drazen,Frank A. Frizelle,Charlotte Haug,John Hoey,Richard Horton,Sheldon Kotzin,Christine Laine,Ana Marušić,A. John P.M. Overbeke,Torben V. Schroeder,Harold C. Sox,Martin B Van Der Weyden +12 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
Paul Glasziou,Douglas G. Altman,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Mike Clarke,Steven A. Julious,Susan Michie,David Moher,Elizabeth Wager +8 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors point out that unless research is adequately reported, the time and resources invested in the conduct of research is wasted, and the high amount of waste also warrants future investment in the monitoring of and research into reporting of research, and active implementation of the findings to ensure that research reports better address the needs of the range of research users.