scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Rapid Diagnostic Centres and early cancer diagnosis

TLDR
In the UK, only 39% of cancer diagnoses were made via 2WW pathways in 2017, while significant proportions of diagnoses are made via other outpatient clinics (32%) or emergency presentation (19%), representing potentially missed diagnostic opportunities as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract
Early cancer diagnosis is a clinical and research priority of the UK government. Earlier cancer diagnosis should enable identification of cancers at an earlier stage, leading to improved outcomes.1 This must be balanced with the potential physical and psychological harms of over-investigation and over-diagnosis. The ‘two-week wait’ (2WW) referral pathway represents the most common route to cancer diagnosis. However, only 39% of cancer diagnoses were made via 2WW pathways in 2017, while significant proportions of diagnoses are made via other outpatient clinics (32%) or emergency presentation (19%), representing potentially missed diagnostic opportunities.2 Approximately 50% of cancer patients present with non-specific but concerning symptoms of cancer (NSCS).3 Compared to ‘alarm symptoms’ these have low predictive values for cancer and are less indicative of site-specific disease; consequently, they are not reflected in 2WW referral criteria.3 These patients frequently are referred later for specialist investigation and have more advanced disease.4 A principal goal for the new NHS Rapid Diagnostic Centres (RDCs) is to provide a pathway for patients with NSCS to detect cancer earlier, where treatment outcomes are more favourable.1 NHS England aims to provide full population coverage with RDCs by 2024.5 Despite their low predictive value and association with multiple diseases, many NSCS are considered as characteristic warning signs of cancer. These include unexpected weight loss, malaise, unexplained pain, new dyspnoea, and persistently abnormal blood tests.4,6,7 Unexpected weight loss was the most common symptom seen within an RDC pilot (66%) between 2016 and 2018;7 however, it has a relatively low predictive value for cancer.6,8,9 While patients with weight loss in isolation may not warrant further investigation, considering other clinical variables …

read more

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

First results from five multidisciplinary diagnostic centre (MDC) projects for non-specific but concerning symptoms, possibly indicative of cancer.

TL;DR: The MDC model diagnoses cancer in patients with non-specific symptoms, with a conversion rate of 8%, demonstrating the diagnostic potential of a non-site-specific symptomatic referral pathway.
Journal ArticleDOI

The association between unexpected weight loss and cancer diagnosis in primary care: a matched cohort analysis of 65,000 presentations

TL;DR: UWL recorded in primary care is associated with a broad range of cancer sites of early and late-stage, and in the 3–24 months after presenting with UWL, cancer diagnosis was less likely than in comparators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cross-sectional study using primary care and cancer registration data to investigate patients with cancer presenting with non-specific symptoms

TL;DR: Differences in the diagnostic pathway show that patients with symptoms mirroring the MDC referral criteria could benefit from a new referral pathway.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rapid cancer diagnosis for patients with vague symptoms: a cost-effectiveness study.

TL;DR: An RDC for patients presenting with vague or non-specific symptoms suspicious of cancer in primary care reduces time to diagnosis and provides excellent value for money if run at ≥80% capacity if capacity utilisation drops below 80%.