Journal ArticleDOI
Realism and America's Rise: A Review Essay
TLDR
In the past few years, some of the most vigorous and interesting debates in international relations theory have emerged among different types of realism as discussed by the authors, and it has become clear that realism is not a single theory, but a family of theories.Abstract:
Real ism is usually regarded as a dominant-and monolithic-approach in the study of international relations. In the past few years, however, some of the most vigorous and interesting debates in international relations theory have emerged among different types of realism. It has become clear that realism is not a single theory, but a family of theories. One of the most significant divides within realism is between offensive realism and defensive realism.* Offensive realists generally argue that the international system fosters conflict and aggression. Security is scarce, making international competition and war likely. Rational states often are compelled to adopt offensive strategies in their search for security.2 Defensive realists, on the other hand, argue that the international system does notread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. Pp. viii, 282. £3·50, paperback £1. 1970. (Cambridge University Press.)
Book
국제정치이론 = Theory of international politics
Kenneth Neal Waltz,건영 박 +1 more
TL;DR: The seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather, one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and deformation as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited
TL;DR: The paper as mentioned in this paper was presented at the 1999 annual meetings of the International Studies Association and the American Political Science Association and was reviewed by Dale Copeland, Bernard Finel, Benjamin Frankel, Benjamin Miller, Jennifer Sterling-Folker, and anonymous reviewers for International Security.
Book
War and state formation in ancient China and early modern Europe
TL;DR: The authors examines why China and Europe shared similar processes but experienced opposite outcomes, and challenges the presumption that Europe was destined to enjoy checks and balances while China was preordained to suffer under a coercive universal status.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia
TL;DR: The authors explored two starkly contrasting analytic approaches to assess the performance of U.S. security strategy in East Asia since 1991: a positivesum approach emphasizing the danger of security dilemmas and spirals of tension, and a zero-sum approach emphasizing power competition and the long-term dangers posed by China's rise.
References
More filters
BookDOI
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
TL;DR: For instance, King, Keohane, Verba, and Verba as mentioned in this paper have developed a unified approach to valid descriptive and causal inference in qualitative research, where numerical measurement is either impossible or undesirable.
After hegemony : cooperation and discord in the world politicaleconomy
TL;DR: Keohane as mentioned in this paper analyzes the institutions, or "international regimes", through which cooperation has taken place in the world political economy and describes the evolution of these regimes as American hegemony has eroded.
Book
After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy
TL;DR: Keohane as discussed by the authors analyzes the institutions, or "international regimes", through which cooperation has taken place in the world political economy and describes the evolution of these regimes as American hegemony has eroded.
Journal ArticleDOI
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
Imre Lakatos,Alan Musgrave +1 more
TL;DR: The distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water as mentioned in this papereyerabend, T. S. Kuhn and T. E. Toulmin have made a distinction between the two categories of science.