scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Reconsidering urban design: Thoughts about its definition and status as a field or profession

Thomas W. Schurch
- 01 Feb 1999 - 
- Vol. 4, Iss: 1, pp 5-28
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a practical definition of thresholds of scale for urban design has been proposed, which can be grouped into categories of being cursory, qualitative and prescriptive, historic, proprietary and process oriented.
Abstract
Since its emergence and rise to significance over the fast 30 years urban design has been loosely defined In this regard, its definition can be grouped into categories of being cursory, qualitative and prescriptive, historic, proprietary and process oriented A practical definition, ie with regard to its status as a field, sees urban design as being form‐giving to built environments as a primary activity involving the professions of architecture, landscape architecture and planning In addition, ‘thresholds of scale’ factor into a practical definition whereby interrelationships of building site, neighbourhoods and districts, the city, metro region and ‘corridors’ are building blocks of design intervention Quality of life, the public realm and process are significant aspects of the thresholds of scale

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept

TL;DR: This article suggests a formal definition of the concept design and proposes a conceptual model linking concepts related to design projects, demonstrating how these two conceptualizations can be useful by showing that the definition of design can be used to classify design knowledge and the conceptual model can be use to classifydesign approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI

Urban design: requiem for an era – review and critique of the last 50 years

TL;DR: In this article, the authors take a hard look at the last 50 years, exposing the most serious attempts to synthesize or theorize significant urban design paradigms and argue that the collective result has been a generalized anarchy of creative ideas that bear little coherence, either internally or collectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Science, pseudo-science and urban design

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the relationship between science and pseudo-science, and question the extent to which urban design theory could be called pseudo-scientific, by considering the hypotheses underlying four classic urban design theories.
Journal ArticleDOI

Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the factors contributing to the recent international trend for a differentiation between planning and urban design and argue that urban design needs to be retained as an important subset of planning practice, concerned with the physical design of cities, so that the core planning values of serving the public interest in the attainment of social equity, democratic civil society, and an ecologically sustainable future may be maintained in our city-building processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-evolutions of planning and design: Risks and benefits of design perspectives in planning systems:

TL;DR: In this article, an evolutionary perspective on spatial planning is developed to investigate the potential contributions of design approaches to the coordination of spatial organization, and the potential contribution of design methods to spatial coordination is investigated.
References
More filters
Book

The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Jane Jacobs
TL;DR: The conditions for city diversity, the generators of diversity, and the need for mixed primary uses are discussed in this paper, with a focus on the use of small blocks for small blocks.
Book

Place and placelessness

Edward Relph
Book

Good city form

Kevin Lynch
TL;DR: Good City Form as mentioned in this paper is a theory of good city form that is a summation and an extension of Lynch's vision, a high point from which he views cities past and possible.
Book

Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature

TL;DR: Vaulting ambition as mentioned in this paper is the first extensive and detailed evaluation of the controversial claims that sociobiologists have made about human nature and human social behavior, and it raises the "sociobiology debate" to a new level, moving beyond arguments about the politics of the various parties involved, the degree to which sociobiology assumes genetic determinism, or the falsifiability of the general theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Vaulting Ambition: Sociology and the Quest for Human Nature.

TL;DR: Vaulting Ambition is the first extensive and detailed evaluation of the controversial claims that sociobiologists have made about human nature and human social behavior and refutes the notions that humans are trapped by their evolutionary biology and history in endlessly repeating patterns of aggression, xenophobia, and deceitfulness.