scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Revealed preference for economics journals: Citations as dollar votes

David N. Laband, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1985 - 
- Vol. 46, Iss: 3, pp 317-324
TLDR
The authors used citations as a proxy for quality of material published, as revealed preference for the journals and found that citations reveal preferences for the top economics journals, much as dollars reveal preferences in product markets.
Abstract
There are several measures which can be used to evaluate professional regard for economics journals. In this paper, I have focused on citations as a proxy for quality of material published, as revealed preference for the journals. The availability of the Social Sciences Citation Index has permitted construction of a relative rating system for economics journals, based on citations, which was virtually impossible for previous researchers to achieve. While the potential objections to using citations as a proxy have been admitted, the proxy is still a useful one — one that reveals preferences for the top economics journals, much as dollars reveal preferences in product markets.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics

TL;DR: In this paper, Measuring the quality of academic journals: The Case of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 369-396, with a focus on academic journals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversity in economics: an analysis of journal quality perceptions

TL;DR: The authors examined the degree of diversity within economics based on the journal quality perceptions of 2,103 AEA economists worldwide and empirically test for factors that might explain differences in an economist's journal quality perception.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the Use and Abuse of Economics Journal Rankings

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a range of information about the citations to papers published in 248 economics journals during the period 2001-5, and show that such information is likely to be more useful in terms of helping someone form more accurate expectations of the quality of a given article published in a journal, than the information provided by mean citations per article only.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Ombudsman: Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists

TL;DR: Armstrong et al. as discussed by the authors found that some researchers are more prolific than others in their research and that the differences between those who publish a great deal and those who published less are explained by factors influencing academic research productivity.
Posted Content

Top ranking economics journals impact variability and a ranking update to the year 2002

TL;DR: This paper validate the ex-ante procedure of computing the average impact of economic papers by comparing its results with the expost values and calibrate an estimator of papers normalised impact, which calculates the ranking variability of journals using a bootstrap procedure.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics

TL;DR: The citations of doctorates in economics (who received the degree between 1950 and 1955) from six major universities are analyzed for articles published in the period 1950-68 in the two fields of value theory (microeconomics) and monetary and fiscal theory (macroeconomics), and citations are examined for commonality in the use of authorities and for parochialism with regard to the faculty of their Ph.D.-granting institution.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Quality Index for Economic Journals

TL;DR: This article showed that the probability limit of the estimated error variance is smaller when the true value of p is used to perform the Orcutt transformation than when any other value po is used.