scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening.

Victoria L. Champion
- 01 Aug 1999 - 
- Vol. 22, Iss: 4, pp 341-348
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The purpose of this research was to revise scales measuring perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers to mammography utilization and these scales represent an improvement in those previously reported.
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to revise scales measuring perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers to mammography utilization. A total of 618 women age 50 and over who were enrolled in a large intervention study participated in data collection. Scales were revised beginning with focus group input. Analyses included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, confirmatory analysis, and known groups techniques to test construct validity. Internal consistency ranged from .75 to .88, and test reliabilities from .59 to .72. Construct validity was confirmed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as known group techniques. Overall these scales represent an improvement in those previously reported.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Health Belief Model as an explanatory framework in communication research: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation.

TL;DR: The results indicate that variable ordering in the Health Belief Model may be complex, may help to explain conflicting results of the past, and may be a good focus for future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors associated with breast cancer screening behaviours in a sample of Turkish women: A questionnaire survey

TL;DR: Higher seriousness of breast cancer, higher benefits of having mammography, having heard/read about Mammography, and having a gynaecologist as a regular physician were significantly associated withHaving mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test: psychometric testing

TL;DR: The Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and the Pap Smear Test was found to be a valid and reliable tool in assessing the women's health beliefs and help healthcare professionals to develop more effective cervical cancer screening programmes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health beliefs and rates of breast cancer screening among Arab women.

TL;DR: Diversity in health beliefs and behaviors exists in religious subgroups and health communications should be modified to suit women in different groups in order to increase participation in screening.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation evidence for Turkish adaptation of Champion's Health Belief Model Scales.

TL;DR: Psychometric testing demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and validity of the instrument for this group of women, and it can be used in planning and testing interventions to improve BSE beliefs and practice.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).

Rosedith Sitgreaves
- 01 Jan 1979 - 
Book

Reliability and Validity Assessment

TL;DR: The paper shows how reliability is assessed by the retest method, alternative-forms procedure, split-halves approach, and internal consistency method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 1999.

TL;DR: The Surveillance Research Program of the American Cancer Society's Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research reports its 33rd annual compilation of cancer frequency, incidence, mortality, and survival data for the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

TL;DR: Invitation to mammographic screening may lead to reduced mortality from breast cancer, at least in women aged 55 or over.
Related Papers (5)