Journal ArticleDOI
Risk versus benefit in mammography.
TLDR
Evidence that significant numbers of breast cancers are found in this age period on the basis of x-ray examination alone is presented, and mammography is recommended as a tool for diagnosis of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.Abstract:
Controversy surrounds the use of mammography in asymptomatic women 35–49 years of age. There is agreement that routine mammography is useful beyond 50 years. By extrapolating data from relatively high radiation exposures, a radiation carcinogenic risk at diagnostic levels has been calculated by some workers. Benefit for asymptomatic women in the 35–49 year age group has been questioned. This paper presents evidence that significant numbers of breast cancers are found in this age period on the basis of x-ray examination alone. Data also indicate absorbed dose from modern-day mammography is half to one quarter of that previously assumed. Based on these data, mammography is recommended as a tool for diagnosis of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
TL;DR: Analysis of data from the ACS/NCI Screening Centers shows current average midbreast doses to be 25 times lower (film/screen) and 3 times lower than the 2 rads previously estimated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cancer of the breast: the past decade (first of two parts).
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure
TL;DR: Analysis suggests that the risk of breast cancer following radiation exposure is greatest for persons exposed as adolescents, although exposure at all ages carries some risk, and age-specific absolute risk estimates for all studies are remarkably similar.
Journal ArticleDOI
Recent developments in breast imaging.
Manfred Säbel,Horst Aichinger +1 more
TL;DR: Since the early 1980s, ultrasound B-mode scanning has evolved to an indispensable adjunct to x-ray mammography and offers the possibility of computer-aided diagnosis by texture analysis and pattern recognition.
Screening for Lung Cancer: Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Linda Humphrey,Mark Deffebach,Miranda Pappas,Christina Baumann,Katie Artis,Jennifer Priest Mitchell,Bernadette Zakher,Rongwei Fu,Christopher G. Slatore +8 more
TL;DR: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR) have been studied for early screening, with several new studies reporting results since the last review.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
TL;DR: A restrospective study of 7,214 patients placed into one of four groups of risk for developing carcinoma of the breast found that there was a 37 times greater incidence for those at highest risk compared to the low risk group.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mammography: a contrary view.
TL;DR: There is good evidence that annual history, physical examination, and mammography can reduce short-term and midrange breast cancer mortality by about one third and promotion of mammography as a general public health measure is premature.
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a method to solve the problem of "missing links" in the literature.Fig. 1Fig. 2Fig. 3Fig. 4Fig. 5
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast Neoplasms in Women Treated With X Rays for Acute Postpartum Mastitis. A Pilot Study
Fred A. Mettler,Louis H. Hempelmann,Arthur M. Dutton,James W. Pifer,Edward T. Toyooka,Wendell R. Ames +5 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Late neoplastic changes following medical irradiation
TL;DR: New additions since 1968 to the literature on radiation carcinogenesis in man support the earlier conclusion of an approximately linear increase in cancer incidence in a broad intermediate dose range for most sites of cancer.
Related Papers (5)
Mammographic surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer: How accurate? How effective?
Nehmat Houssami,Stefano Ciatto +1 more