scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk versus benefit in mammography.

Richard G. Lester
- 01 Jul 1977 - 
- Vol. 124, Iss: 1, pp 1-6
TLDR
Evidence that significant numbers of breast cancers are found in this age period on the basis of x-ray examination alone is presented, and mammography is recommended as a tool for diagnosis of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.
Abstract
Controversy surrounds the use of mammography in asymptomatic women 35–49 years of age. There is agreement that routine mammography is useful beyond 50 years. By extrapolating data from relatively high radiation exposures, a radiation carcinogenic risk at diagnostic levels has been calculated by some workers. Benefit for asymptomatic women in the 35–49 year age group has been questioned. This paper presents evidence that significant numbers of breast cancers are found in this age period on the basis of x-ray examination alone. Data also indicate absorbed dose from modern-day mammography is half to one quarter of that previously assumed. Based on these data, mammography is recommended as a tool for diagnosis of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.

TL;DR: Analysis of data from the ACS/NCI Screening Centers shows current average midbreast doses to be 25 times lower (film/screen) and 3 times lower than the 2 rads previously estimated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure

TL;DR: Analysis suggests that the risk of breast cancer following radiation exposure is greatest for persons exposed as adolescents, although exposure at all ages carries some risk, and age-specific absolute risk estimates for all studies are remarkably similar.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent developments in breast imaging.

TL;DR: Since the early 1980s, ultrasound B-mode scanning has evolved to an indispensable adjunct to x-ray mammography and offers the possibility of computer-aided diagnosis by texture analysis and pattern recognition.

Screening for Lung Cancer: Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation

TL;DR: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR) have been studied for early screening, with several new studies reporting results since the last review.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer

TL;DR: A restrospective study of 7,214 patients placed into one of four groups of risk for developing carcinoma of the breast found that there was a 37 times greater incidence for those at highest risk compared to the low risk group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mammography: a contrary view.

TL;DR: There is good evidence that annual history, physical examination, and mammography can reduce short-term and midrange breast cancer mortality by about one third and promotion of mammography as a general public health measure is premature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a method to solve the problem of "missing links" in the literature.Fig. 1Fig. 2Fig. 3Fig. 4Fig. 5
Journal ArticleDOI

Late neoplastic changes following medical irradiation

TL;DR: New additions since 1968 to the literature on radiation carcinogenesis in man support the earlier conclusion of an approximately linear increase in cancer incidence in a broad intermediate dose range for most sites of cancer.
Related Papers (5)