scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) is presented in a random sample, representative of the general Norwegian population, and sociodemographic variables affecting the scale scores are explored and discussed.
Abstract
Anchoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in population norms makes clinical interpretations more meaningful and is in accordance with practice in other fields of medicine. In this paper norms for the Short Form 36 (SF-36) are presented in a random sample, representative of the general Norwegian population. In addition, sociodemographic variables affecting the scale scores are explored and discussed. The response rate was 67%, being lowest among subjects aged 70 years or over. Data-completeness strongly declined with increasing age. Physical health scales were also strongly affected by age. In all scales, with the exception of general health perceptions, women reported having poorer health than men. Marital status affected the four mental health scales. Educational status affected all the scales, but the effect was smallest in the mental scales. These norms can be employed for comparison in case-control studies, or to interpret HRQOL changes in prospective studies. Differences in social status should be given special attention. Caution should be exercised when assessing subjective health or employing the norms among subjects aged 70 years or over.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36).

TL;DR: Results suggest that the shorter versions of SCL perform almost as well as the full version, and that the MHI-5 correlates highly with the SCL and the AUC indicate that the instruments might replace each other in population surveys, at least when considering depression.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Comparison of Five Low Back Disability Questionnaires: Reliability and Responsiveness

TL;DR: Measurements obtained with the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale were the most reliable and had sufficient width scale to reliably detect improvement or worsening in most subjects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pain in Parkinson's disease: Prevalence and characteristics.

TL;DR: Pain is frequent and disabling, independent of demographic and clinical variables except for female gender, and is significantly more common in Parkinson’s patients compared to the general population and is not associated with age, disease duration or severity of the disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease.

TL;DR: In patients with predialysis CKD, mortality is higher in men than women; however, this difference disappears for patients on RRT, and health-related quality of life while on R RT is poorer in women than men, and women report a higher burden of symptoms.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

John E. Ware, +1 more
- 01 Jun 1992 - 
TL;DR: A 36-item short-form survey designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study is constructed.
Book

SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide

John E. Ware
TL;DR: TheSF-36 is a generic health status measure which has gained popularity as a measure of outcome in a wide variety of patient groups and social and the contribution of baseline health, sociodemographic and work-related factors to the SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide is tested.
Journal ArticleDOI

The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

TL;DR: Findings support the use of the SF-36 survey across the diverse populations studied and identify population groups in which use of standardized health status measures may or may not be problematic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

TL;DR: The SF-36 was able to detect low levels of ill health in patients who had scored 0 (good health) on the Nottingham health profile and is a promising new instrument for measuring health perception in a general population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

TL;DR: For eight of nine common chronic medical conditions, patients with the condition showed markedly worse physical, role, and social functioning; mental health; health perceptions; and/or bodily pain compared with patients with no chronic conditions.