scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fish Sarotherodon niloticus L.

Heinrich Münz
- 01 Sep 1985 - 
- Vol. 157, Iss: 5, pp 555-568
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
During stimulation of the neuromasts by sinusoidal water movements of small amplitude and different frequencies, the response characteristics of SN and CN units were determined by linear frequency analysis under steady state conditions and the functional significance of the differences between the two types of lateral line neuromast (SNs and CNs) were discussed.
Abstract
The activities of single afferent fibers were recorded in the trunk lateral line nerve of the cichlid fishSarotherodon niloticus L. Using both electrophysiological recordings and neuroanatomical tracing techniques, the number, arrangement, and innervation of superficial (SNs) and canal (CNs) neuromasts were determined. Both, SNs and CNs, are innervated by several afferent fibers of different diameters and efferent fibers. The CNs and SNs are neuronally separated: afferent fibers which innervate both CNs and SNs were not found. Whereas the single CN is innervated by a separate set of afferent fibers, fibers innervating the SNs within rows often branched to reach all or several SNs. The SNs within a row were thus considered to form a functional unit. With the exception of SNs on the tail fin, functional units of neuromasts were in general topographically restricted to single scales. The majority of lateral line units had resting activity. On the basis of the time interval distribution of the resting activity, 4 types of units were classified: these were labelled irregular (type I), regular (type II), bimodal (type III) and silent (type IV). Type I was the most common type of resting activity (obtained in 47.8% of the recorded units). Units with this resting activity type were identified as afferents innervating either SNs or CNs. Units with resting activity of type II represented mostly afferents of CNs if their mean activity was high (around 40 imp/s). If the mean activity of this type was below 20 imp/s the units were unresponsive to local water movements and at least some were identified as efferent fibers. Resting activity of type III was found only in units originating from CNs. Only 4% of the units were silent (type IV). These units were often identified as injured neuromasts. Units originating from CNs show higher mean resting activity than those from SNs. For both SN and CN units, the mean discharge rate of the resting activity correlated with the sensitivity to stimulation for sinusoidal water movements. During stimulation of the neuromasts by sinusoidal water movements of small amplitude and different frequencies, the response characteristics of SN and CN units were determined by linear frequency analysis under steady state conditions. Most units responded linearly to small stimulus amplitudes. In this amplitude range the units' resting activity was modulated according to the stimulus frequency. Small stimulus amplitudes proportionally changed the amount of modulation but did not alter the phase of the response. CN and SN units that responded linearly produce differing frequency responses. Whereas CNs were most sensitive at frequencies of up to 200 Hz (center frequencies between 100 and 200 Hz), the center frequencies of SNs were distributed between 10 and 70 Hz with a maximum number at about 30 Hz. Bode plots for many CN and SN units indicated that the neuromasts were sensitive to the acceleration component of the water movement. The functional significance of the differences between the two types of lateral line neuromasts (SNs and CNs) were discussed.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Field Detection

TL;DR: Fishes have an impressive complement of hydrodynamic and acoustic sensors, commonly referred to as the lateral-line and inner-ear sense organs, which are determined mainly by the peripheral structures coupling the ciliary bundles to the physical world that the animals inhabit.
Book ChapterDOI

Diversity of Lateral Line Systems: Evolutionary and Functional Considerations

TL;DR: The concept of a single lateral line system has given way to one of at least two different sensory systems, with emerging evidence of anatomical functional variability within each of these.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lateral line system of fish

TL;DR: The present paper reviews some more recent aspects of the morphology, behavioral relevance and physiology of the fish lateral line and reports some new findings with regard to the coding of bulk water flow.
Book ChapterDOI

Functional Evolution of Lateral Line and Inner Ear Sensory Systems

TL;DR: In detecting moving objects, the fish’s lateral line and inner ear support different, but closely related, hydrodynamic functions, suggesting early developments in the vertebrate sense of hearing.
Book ChapterDOI

The Enigmatic Lateral Line System

TL;DR: One of the interesting stories of hearing in general, and in aquatic vertebrates in particular, is how the structures associated with hair cell organs play a major role in modifying or channeling the environmental stimulus onto the hair cell receptors.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The functioning and significance of the lateral-line organs.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of the problem: this article...,.. ].. ).. ]... )...
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sensory Basis of Fish Schools: Relative Roles of Lateral Line and Vision*

TL;DR: The role of the lateral line in schooling is much greater than has been recognised previously and is suggested to be maintained by opposing forces of attraction and repulsion mediated by stimuli perceived by the visual and lateralis systems respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve

TL;DR: Differences in rates of spontaneous discharge and thresholds to tones among these labeled neurons were closely correlated with morphological differences in the caliber and location of their unmyelinated terminals on the body of the inner hair cell.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence that the Lateral‐Line Organ Responds to Near‐Field Displacements of Sound Sources in Water

TL;DR: The lateral line organ of killifish is sensitive to a linear function of water displacements associated with the near-field of sound sources, with the displacement probably being the most important factor rather than velocity or acceleration as mentioned in this paper.