scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Spiritual, but not religious : understanding unchurched America

Robert C. Fuller
- Vol. 1
TLDR
In this article, the authors show that alternative spiritual practices have a long and rich history in America, dating back to the colonial period, when church membership rarely exceeded 17% and interest in astrology, numerology, magic, and witchcraft ran high.
Abstract
Nearly 40% of all Americans have no connection with organized religion. Yet many of these people, even though they might never step inside a house of worship, live profoundly spiritual lives. But what is the nature and value of unchurched spirituality in America? Is it a recent phenomenon, a New Age fad that will soon fade, or a long-standing and essential aspect of the American experience? In Spiritual But Not Religious, Robert Fuller offers fascinating answers to these questions. He shows that alternative spiritual practices have a long and rich history in America, dating back to the colonial period, when church membership rarely exceeded 17% and interest in astrology, numerology, magic, and witchcraft ran high. Fuller traces such unchurched traditions into the mid-nineteenth century, when Americans responded enthusiastically to new philosophies such as Swedenborgianism, Transcendentalism, and mesmerism, right up to the current interest in meditation, channeling, divination, and a host of other unconventional spiritual practices. Throughout, Fuller argues that far from the flighty and narcissistic dilettantes they are often made out to be, unchurched spiritual seekers embrace a mature and dynamic set of basic beliefs. They focus on inner sources of spirituality and on this world rather than the afterlife; they believe in the accessibility of God and in the mind's untapped powers; they see a fundamental unity between science and religion and an equality between genders and races; and they are more willing to test their beliefs and change them when they prove untenable. Timely, sweeping in its scope, and informed by a clear historical understanding, Spiritual But Not Religious offers fresh perspective on the growing numbers of Americans who find their spirituality outside the church.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
MonographDOI

Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide

TL;DR: In this article, a case study of Islam and politics in post-communist Europe and the United States is presented, focusing on the theory of existential security and the consequences of Secularization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging

TL;DR: The evidence suggests that belief has in fact eroded in Britain at the same rate as two key aspects of belonging: religious affiliation and attendance as discussed by the authors, and the roles of period, cohort and age effects on religious change are considered; the conclusion is that decline is generational.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spiritual But Not Religious? Evidence for Two Independent Dispositions

TL;DR: Using a large sample of American adults, analyses demonstrate that subjective spirituality and tradition-oriented religiousness are empirically highly independent and have distinctly different correlates in the personality domain, suggesting that individuals with different dispositions tend toward different styles of religious/spiritual beliefs.
MonographDOI

Religion and the Workplace: Pluralism, Spirituality, Leadership

TL;DR: The authors analyzes the current interest in religion and spirituality in US companies and proposes a model of respectful pluralism, asserting that the task of effective and ethical leadership in organizations is not to promote a single spiritual or religious framework but to create an environment in which managers and employees can respectfully express their own beliefs and practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology

TL;DR: In this article, a demarcation of postmodernity from modernity is proposed, which is based on the primacy of science relative to technology prior to circa 1980, and the relative importance of technology relative to science since about that date.
Related Papers (5)