Institution
University of Gdańsk
Education•Gdańsk, Poland•
About: University of Gdańsk is a education organization based out in Gdańsk, Poland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Quantum entanglement. The organization has 7610 authors who have published 17899 publications receiving 250561 citations. The organization is also known as: Uniwersytet Gdański & University of Gdansk.
Topics: Population, Quantum entanglement, Excited state, Luminescence, Quantum
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, necessary and sufficient conditions for the separability of mixed states were provided for 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 systems, where the positivity of the partial transposition of a state is sufficient and necessary for its separability.
2,854 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the question of how many entangled or separable states there are in the set of all quantum states is considered, and a natural measure in the space of density matrices is proposed to describe $N$-dimensional quantum systems.
Abstract: The question of how many entangled or, respectively, separable states there are in the set of all quantum states is considered. We propose a natural measure in the space of density matrices $\ensuremath{\varrho}$ describing $N$-dimensional quantum systems. We prove that, under this measure, the set of separable states possesses a nonzero volume. Analytical lower and upper bounds of this volume are also derived for $N=2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ and $N=2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}3$ cases. Finally, numerical Monte Carlo calculations allow us to estimate the volume of separable states, providing numerical evidence that it decreases exponentially with the dimension of the composite system. We have also analyzed a conditional measure of separability under the condition of fixed purity. Our results display a clear dualism between purity and separability: entanglement is typical of pure states, while separability is connected with quantum mixtures. In particular, states of sufficiently low purity are necessarily separable.
1,232 citations
••
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz2, Sara Abdelfatah3, Mahmoud Abdellatif4 +2980 more•Institutions (777)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
1,129 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that any separable state on the Hilbert space 7-1= XI 8 l-t2 can be written as a convex combination of N pure product states with N < (dim’H)
1,127 citations
••
TL;DR: Peres as mentioned in this paper showed that if a mixed state can be distilled to the singlet form it must violate partial transposition criterion, which implies that there are two qualitatively different types of entanglement.
Abstract: It is shown that if a mixed state can be distilled to the singlet form it must violate partial transposition criterion [A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1413 (1996)]. It implies that there are two qualitatively different types of entanglement: ``free'' entanglement which is distillable, and ``bound'' entanglement which cannot be brought to the singlet form useful for quantum communication purposes. A possible physical meaning of the result is discussed.
1,060 citations
Authors
Showing all 7682 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Kurunthachalam Kannan | 126 | 820 | 59886 |
Robert J. Cava | 125 | 1042 | 71819 |
Harold A. Scheraga | 120 | 1152 | 66461 |
Joseph R. Lakowicz | 104 | 850 | 76257 |
Baldomero M. Olivera | 92 | 503 | 32064 |
Costa Georgopoulos | 84 | 217 | 26331 |
Donald R. Helinski | 79 | 230 | 29833 |
David R. Goodlett | 74 | 216 | 26636 |
Jacek Jassem | 73 | 602 | 35976 |
Jacek Namieśnik | 72 | 718 | 22822 |
Shlomo Magdassi | 64 | 450 | 17310 |
Jack Simons | 63 | 413 | 15941 |
Waclaw Szybalski | 62 | 276 | 14767 |
Jerzy Falandysz | 61 | 430 | 13821 |
Ignacy Gryczynski | 61 | 545 | 16705 |