Journal ArticleDOI
Stakeholder assessment in construction projects using a CRITIC-TOPSIS approach
TLDR
In this paper , a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) based approach, through the combined use of Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods has been incorporated to objectively evaluate the weights of the stakeholder attributes and their ranking with a specific focus on construction megaprojects.Abstract:
PurposeStakeholder assessment is based on attributes possessed by stakeholders, making the process heavily reliant on evaluating attribute weights. The present assessment methods are based on Analytical Hierarchy Process, Analytical Network Process, and pairwise comparisons that heavily rely on decision-makers’ skills and knowledge. An objective evaluation of attribute weight needs to be done to overcome this challenge.Design/methodology/approachA Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) based approach, through the combined use of Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods has been incorporated to objectively evaluate the weights of the stakeholder attributes and their ranking with a specific focus on construction megaprojects. Five stakeholder attributes and twelve commonly associated stakeholders with megaprojects were considered to achieve this.FindingsThe new model presented power, durability and legitimacy as three important stakeholder attributes, further used to determine stakeholder importance. The client, contractor and project manager were identified as the top three internal stakeholders, and customers, local community and utility service providers as three crucial external stakeholders.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings from the proposed method provide the practitioners with updated information about the attributes they need to look into when planning stakeholder involvement and management. Further, it also leads them to the established framework for the provided stakeholder ranking when planning their management strategies.Originality/valueThe use of CRITIC method allowed to address the possibility of any correlation between the attributes in their weight determination. This was one of the advantages as co-relation between the attributes during their weight determination has not been addressed in previous methods.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation Approach for Efficient Countermeasure Techniques Against Denial-of-Service Attack on MPSoC-Based IoT Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
Ahmed Abbas Jasim Al-Hchaimi,N. Ariff bin Sulaiman,Mohd Sarifuddin bin Othman @ Mustafa,Mohd Nazim Mohtar,Siti Lailatul Binti Mohd Hassan,Yousif Raad Muhsen +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed a Fermatean-FDOSM framework for evaluating DoS A-CTs in the context of MPSoCs-based IoT and CRITIC techniques to weight the criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation Approach for Efficient Countermeasure Techniques Against Denial-of-Service Attack on MPSoC-Based IoT Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed a Fermatean-FDOSM framework for evaluating DoS A-CTs in the context of MPSoCs-based IoT and CRITIC techniques to weight the criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comprehensive evaluation approach for efficient countermeasure techniques against timing side-channel attack on MPSoC-based IoT using multi-criteria decision-making methods
Ahmed Abbas Jasim Al-Hchaimi,N. Sulaiman,Mohd Sarifuddin bin Othman @ Mustafa,Mohd Rizal Bin Mohtar,Yousif Raad Muhsen +4 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors proposed a Fermatean-FDOSM framework for evaluating TSCA-CTs in the context of MPSoCs-based IoT and CRITIC techniques to weight the criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fuzzy Taxonomy Based Optimal Decision Making on Construction Materials
TL;DR: In this paper , a decision-making model is developed to make optimal selection of construction materials based on five core criteria, and a decision matrix with linguistic values representing the criterion satisfaction of the alternatives is subjected to the proposed method of fuzzy taxonomy to derive the optimal ranking results of the construction materials that are considered as the alternatives.
Journal ArticleDOI
Development of a Performance Index Model for Evaluation of BIM-Based Stakeholder Management Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation
Sulakshya Gaur,Abhay Tawalare +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper , a survey was conducted among 55 respondents with experience in using building information modeling (BIM) in mega-construction projects and the data were initially analyzed through factor analysis to establish six key performance indicators (KPIs): asset performance, open innovation, project O&M expenses, design process efficiency, project execution efficiency, and stakeholder concerns.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts
TL;DR: In this paper, a theory of stakeholder identification and saliency based on stakeholders possessing one or more of three relationship attributes (power, legitimacy, and urgency) is proposed, and a typology of stakeholders, propositions concerning their saliency to managers of the firm, and research and management implications.
Journal ArticleDOI
Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method
TL;DR: A method for the determination of objective weights which is based on the quantification of two fundamental notions of MCDM: the contrast intensity and the conflicting character of the evaluation criteria is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
TL;DR: This study investigates the performance of eight methods for solving multi-attribute decision making problems (MADM) using a decision matrix input of N criteria weights and ratings of L alternatives on each criterion, and investigates similarities and differences in the behavior of these methods.
Journal ArticleDOI
Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice
TL;DR: In this paper, the main factors relevant to cost estimating practice are complexity of the project, scale and scope of the construction, market conditions, method of construction, site constraints, client's financial position, buildability and location of a project.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS)
TL;DR: A new Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS) method for a sustainable supplier selection in the healthcare industry (in a polyclinic) in Bosnia and Herzegovina is developed and shows that A2 remains the best alternative.