Texture analysis in digitally-acquired echocardiographic images: the effect of JPEG compression and video storage.

TLDR: The analysis of texture in video-stored echocardiographic images is an established method to characterize myocardial pathologies and it is concluded that texture of video-Stored images is not comparable to that of digitally-storied images and that JPEG compression changes important second-order texture parameters.

Abstract: The analysis of texture in video-stored echocardiographic images is an established method to characterize myocardial pathologies. We investigated whether or not texture parameters calculated from video-stored images and those derived from the joint photographic expert group (JPEG) format compressed data are equivalent to those calculated from uncompressed digital images. Texture parameters were calculated using uncompressed digital data, images stored on videotape, and three forms of compressed digital data (baseline JPEG, JPEG 2000 and lossless JPEG 2000). Video storage heavily affected most texture parameters. Although first-order texture parameters derived from JPEG-compressed images were generally equivalent to those derived from the uncompressed data, several second-order parameters differed significantly. We conclude that texture of video-stored images is not comparable to that of digitally-stored images and that JPEG compression changes important second-order texture parameters. This observation should be taken into account when analyzing texture of modern image data (uncompressed or compressed) and comparing the results with earlier studies utilizing video-stored data.