The effect of body size on animal abundance.

TLDR: Estimates of animal density and body mass culled from 12 journals published between 1961 and 1978 are used to test and extend Damuth's relationship between populationdensity and body size of herbivorous mammals, and his analysis is supported.

Abstract: Although it is a commonplace that small animals are more abundant than large ones, few attempts have been made to quantify this and none for non-mammalian species. This study uses estimates of animal density and body mass culled from 12 journals published between 1961 and 1978 to test and extend Damuth's relationship between population density and body size of herbivorous mammals. In general, his analysis is supported, for density usually declines roughly as W -0.75 and poikilotherms maintain higher densities than homeotherms. However the residual variation is higher than Damuth's regressions might suggest and significant differences exist among animal groups. In particular, birds maintain much lower, and aquatic invertebrates much higher abundances than a general curve for all species would suggest. Carnivores are significantly rarer than herbivores. These relationships may be used to compare the average relative contributions of species of different size to community structure and function. Such relations also provide a necessary basis both for more complete empirical analyses of the determinants of animal abundance and for the construction of more realistic conceptual models in theoretical ecology.