Open Access
The effectiveness of psychotherapy.
About:
The article was published on 1994-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 1098 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Studying the effectiveness of psychotherapy: How well can clinical trials do the job?
TL;DR: Clinical trials can answer all of the questions regarding the effectiveness of psychotherapy posed by M. E. P. Seligman, without the interpretive ambiguities and other methodological problems inherent in surveys such as the one published in CR.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data.
TL;DR: The clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program Data was evaluated and there was substantial agreement among diverse methods of measurement regarding the identification of individuals making clinically significant change.
Journal ArticleDOI
Empirically Supported Treatment: Recommendations for a New Model
TL;DR: A revised set of criteria for ESTs that will utilize existing systematic reviews of all of the available literature, and recommendations that address the methodological quality, outcomes, populations, and treatment settings included in the literature are recommended.
Journal ArticleDOI
Therapist effects in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report an analysis of therapist effects in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program using hierarchical linear modeling, and investigate the possible interaction of therapists with initial patient severity and difficulty levels.
Journal ArticleDOI
A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain
TL;DR: A scale for assessing the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials for psychological treatments was developed using the Delphi method and discriminated between trials globally judged as good and poor by experts, and trial quality was shown to be a function of year of publication.