Open AccessPosted Content
The Federal Advisory Committee Act
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FAC) as discussed by the authors is a congressional attempt to institute administrative controls and to open to public scrutiny the operations of nongovernmental groups that supply advice to the government.Abstract:
The Federal Advisory Committee Act, enacted on October 6, 1972 is a congressional attempt to institute administrative controls and to open to public scrutiny the operations of nongovernmental groups that supply advice to the government. Because many such groups have an interest in any action that the government may institute, the danger of abuse is apparent. Moreover, advisory groups are often used to divert attention from sensitive issues, or even to delay a decision on an issue where there are strongly different views. And, all too often, the advisory committee system provides a medium for bestowing political favors, such as appointment to a prestigious commission. This legislation seeks to correct such abuses by requiring balanced membership, mandating that the use of an advisory committee be justified, and opening advisory committee operations to public scrutiny. The statute also seeks to curb unnecessary expenditures on such committees through administrative controls and to terminate committees that are no longer fulfilling a useful function. This Article analyzes the problems that the statute was designed to remedy and proposes a construction to fulfill these purposes.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy
Steven J. Balla,John R. Wright +1 more
TL;DR: Weingast et al. as mentioned in this paper found that public endorsements by interest groups are influential in the selection process of the NDWAC, an advisory committee within the Environmental Protection Agency, and thus in the EPA's policymaking process.
Journal ArticleDOI
The National Children's Study of environmental effects on child health and development.
Amy M. Branum,Gwen W. Collman,Adolfo Correa,Sarah A. Keim,Woodie Kessel,Carole A. Kimmel,Mark A. Klebanoff,Matthew P. Longnecker,Pauline Mendola,Marc L. Rigas,Sherry G. Selevan,Peter C. Scheidt,Kenneth S Schoendorf,Eleanor Smith-Khuri,Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp +14 more
TL;DR: This article proposes a framework for a new cohort study of children, with follow-up beginning before birth and continuing to age 21 years, and how the proposed cohort could be used to examine the effect of chemical contaminants in breast milk on children's health and development.
Journal ArticleDOI
U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA
TL;DR: A number of initiatives are underway in the United States in response to the 2009 critique of forensic science, including efforts of the White House National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Forensic Science and a partnership between the Department of Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to create the National Commission on Forensic science and the Organization of Scientific Area Committees.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Guidelines: Update of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Policies and Procedures
Quyen Ngo-Metzger,Virginia A. Moyer,David C. Grossman,Mark H. Ebell,Meghan Woo,Therese Miller,Tana Brummer,Joya Chowdhury,Elisabeth Kato,Albert Siu,William R. Phillips,Karina W. Davidson,Maureen G. Phipps,Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo +13 more
TL;DR: The conflicts of interest policy for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is described, as is the formal process by which best practices were incorporated to update the policy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Key Elements for Judging the Quality of a Risk Assessment
TL;DR: The key characteristics of a high-quality assessment can be summarized and integrated into a guide for judging whether an assessment possesses the desired features of high quality, transparency, and usefulness.