scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Military Revolution, Administrative Development, and Cultural Change in Early Modern Russia

Marshall Poe
- 01 Jan 1998 - 
- Vol. 2, Iss: 3, pp 247-273
TLDR
The authors examines the links between military reform, administrative development, and cultural change in the Muscovite context and argues that the "Europeanizing" military reforms had a significant impact on both Russian government and culture, at least among the service elite.
Abstract
Among Western historians it is generally agreed that the "military revolution" spurred bureaucratization, and that bureaucracy in turn caused social and cultural change. This essay examines the links between military reform, administrative development, and cultural change in the Muscovite context. It argues that the "Europeanizing" military reforms of the mid-sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century indeed had a significant impact on both Russian government and culture, at least among the service elite. In the era of Ivan III (1462-1505), the Muscovite court was a moderately-sized gathering of unlettered warriors who, together with a small group of scribes, managed a considerable principality in northeastern Rus'. A bit more than a century later the court was a much more complex entity comprising a well-stratified political elite, a system of functionally differentiated chancelleries, and a large network of gunpowder military forces. Behind this transformation were successive waves of military reform, waves which brought with them well-elaborated literate administration. The coming of literate administration to the governing class-the court elite, chancellery personnel, and higher gentry-had four effects: integration on an imperial level; increased status and functional differentiation; a slow movement from mechanical to organic solidarity; and, finally, the impersonalization of social identity.

read more

Citations
More filters

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

TL;DR: The abstract should follow the structure of the article (relevance, degree of exploration of the problem, the goal, the main results, conclusion) and characterize the theoretical and practical significance of the study results.
Book

Strange parallels : Southeast Asia in global context, c 800-1830

TL;DR: This paper argued that Southeast Asia, Europe, Japan, China, and South Asia all embodied idiosyncratic versions of a Eurasian-wide pattern whereby local isolates cohered to form ever larger, more stable, more complex political and cultural systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Military Transformation in the Ottoman Empire and Russia, 1500–1800

Gábor Ágoston
- 22 Mar 2011 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare the Ottoman and Russian military capabilities from circa 1500 through 1800, focusing on recruitment strategies and methods of resource mobilization, and argue that the differences between the two empires can be traced to the cultural context of specific societies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Village into Garrison: The Militarized Peasant Communities of Southern Muscovy

Brian Davies
- 01 Oct 1992 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the history of the dragoons' service on the southern frontier of Muscovy's southern frontier in the first half of the seventeenth century and showed how ephemeral the Belgorod Line was as a "social frontier" offering its colonists juridical and economic freedom.
Trending Questions (1)
What were the different ways in which the Revolutionary armies influenced governance?

The military reforms in early modern Russia led to the development of a well-elaborated literate administration, which had four effects on governance: integration on an imperial level, increased status and functional differentiation, a slow movement from mechanical to organic solidarity, and the impersonalization of social identity.