How does the law of the European Union affect health law and policy? At first sight, it seems limited. However, despite its restricted formal competence, the EU has recently become increasingly involved in the health field. Litigation based on EU law has resulted in a 'right to receive health care services' across national boundaries which may have huge practical implications for national health systems. The EU has promulgated legislation regulating clinical research, and the marketing of pharmaceuticals; patients' rights are affected by EU legislation on data protection and product liability; the qualifications of health care professionals are legally recognised across the EU; and the EU has acted to promote public health. This book explores the various impacts of measures of EU law on national health law and policy. Through elaboration of selected examples, the authors show that, within the EU, health law cannot be regarded as a purely national affair.

/pdf/health-law-and-the-european-union-1znzofhaap.pdf

The new Tobacco Control Directive: an illiberal and illegal disdain for the law

Health Law and the European Union

At a time when policy makers want to change the behaviour of citizens to tackle a broad range of social problems, such as climate change, excessive drinking, obesity and crime, a promising new policy approach has appeared that seems capable of escaping the liberal reservations typically associated with all forms of regulatory action. After having relied on the assumption that governments can only change people's behaviour through rules and regulations, policy makers now seem ready to design policies that better reflect how people really behave, not how they are assumed to behave as rational agents. The approach, which stems from the increasingly ubiquitous findings of behavioural research, is generally captured under the evocative concept of ‘nudge’. Inspired by ‘libertarian paternalism’, it suggests that the goal of public policies should be to steer citizens towards making positive decisions as individuals and for society while preserving individual choice. Acting as ‘choice architects’ policy makers organize the context, process and environment in which individuals make decisions. In so doing, they exploit some patterns of irrationality, often called ‘cognitive biases’, to manipulate people's choices. Thus, in the famous Cafeteria example, the school's management might try to affect students’ diet by rearranging the display of food to make it more likely that students will choose the healthy option. This innovative approach to policy making is part of a broader shift from traditional regulation to regulatory governance that is generally referred to as New Governance.

The new Tobacco Control Directive: an illiberal and illegal disdain for the law

Citations

Health Law and the European Union

Nudging Smokers The Behavioural Turn of Tobacco Risk Regulation

Health Law and the European Union: Regulation of health care professionals

Health Law and the European Union: Historical, legal and institutional contexts

Health Law and the European Union: Data protection and health information privacy

Related Papers (5)

The Transformation of Europe

Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach

The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity

The Influence of European Law On National Health Policy

The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an Institutional Actor