scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The treatment of cardiovascular risk in primary care using electronic decision support (TORPEDO) study: Intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian primary healthcare

TLDR
HealthTracker is developed, a multifaceted EDS and quality improvement intervention to improve the management of CVD risk, which consists of point-of-care decision support; a risk communication interface; a clinical audit tool to assess performance on CVD-related indicators; and a quality improvement component comprising peer-ranked data feedback and support to develop strategies to improve performance.
Abstract
Background Large gaps exist in the implementation of guideline recommendations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk management. Electronic decision support (EDS) systems are promising interventions to close these gaps but few have undergone clinical trial evaluation in Australia. We have developed HealthTracker, a multifaceted EDS and quality improvement intervention to improve the management of CVD risk. Methods/design It is hypothesised that the use of HealthTracker over a 12-month period will result in: (1) an increased proportion of patients receiving guideline-indicated measurements of CVD risk factors and (2) an increased proportion of patients at high risk will receive guideline-indicated prescriptions for lowering their CVD risk. Sixty health services (40 general practices and 20 Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation to receive either the intervention package or continue with usual care, stratified by service type, size and participation in existing quality improvement initiatives. The intervention consists of point-of-care decision support; a risk communication interface; a clinical audit tool to assess performance on CVD-related indicators; a quality improvement component comprising peer-ranked data feedback and support to develop strategies to improve performance. The control arm will continue with usual care without access to these intervention components. Quantitative data will be derived from cross-sectional samples at baseline and end of study via automated data extraction. Detailed process and economic evaluations will also be conducted. Ethics and dissemination The general practice component of the study is approved by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and the ACCHS component is approved by the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council HREC. Formal agreements with each of the participating sites have been signed. In addition to the usual scientific forums, results will be disseminated via newsletters, study websites, face-to-face feedback forums and workshops. Trial registration The trial is registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611000478910.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Aboriginal community controlled health services: leading the way in primary care

TL;DR: A broad range of primary health care data provides a sound evidence base for comparing the health outcomes for Indigenous people in ACCHSs with the outcomes achieved through mainstream services, and data show models of comprehensivePrimary health care consistent with the patient‐centred medical home model.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory

TL;DR: The effects of e-A&F interventions were found to be highly variable and to implicitly target only a fraction of known theoretical domains, even after omitting domains presumed not to be linked to e- A&F.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

TL;DR: Low-quality evidence evidence suggests that providing CVD risk scores may have little or no effect on CVD events compared with usual care, and preventive interventions may increase new or intensified lipid-lowering medications in higher-risk people.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Randomised controlled trial of a consumer-focused e-health strategy for cardiovascular risk management in primary care : the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) study protocol

TL;DR: Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) aims to test whether a consumer-focused e-health strategy provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-indigenous adults, recruited through primary care, at moderate-to-high risk of a cardiovascular disease event will improve risk factor control when compared with usual care.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of an angiotensin-converting -enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients

TL;DR: Ramipril significantly reduces the rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in a broad range of high-risk patients who are not known to have a low ejection fraction or heart failure.
Journal Article

MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Commentary

Salim Yusuf
- 01 Jan 2002 - 
TL;DR: Adding simvastatin to existing treatments safely produces substantial additional benefits for a wide range of high-risk patients, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients

TL;DR: Aspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardian infarctions, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Improvement in practitioner performance was associated with CDSSs that automatically prompted users compared with requiring users to activate the system and studies in which the authors were not the developers, as well as other factors.
Related Papers (5)