scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?

TLDR
A review of the literature on public acceptance of wind energy can be found in this paper, revealing the following lessons learned: North American support for wind energy has been consistently high and the NIMBY explanation for resistance to wind development is invalid, and Socioeconomic impacts of wind development are strongly tied to acceptance.
Abstract
Thirty years of North American research on public acceptance of wind energy has produced important insights, yet knowledge gaps remain. This review synthesizes the literature, revealing the following lessons learned. (1) North American support for wind has been consistently high. (2) The NIMBY explanation for resistance to wind development is invalid. (3) Socioeconomic impacts of wind development are strongly tied to acceptance. (4) Sound and visual impacts of wind facilities are strongly tied to annoyance and opposition, and ignoring these concerns can exacerbate conflict. (5) Environmental concerns matter, though less than other factors, and these concerns can both help and hinder wind development. (6) Issues of fairness, participation, and trust during the development process influence acceptance. (7) Distance from turbines affects other explanatory variables, but alone its influence is unclear. (8) Viewing opposition as something to be overcome prevents meaningful understandings and implementation of best practices. (9) Implementation of research findings into practice has been limited. The paper also identifies areas for future research on wind acceptance. With continued research efforts and a commitment toward implementing research findings into developer and policymaker practice, conflict and perceived injustices around proposed and existing wind energy facilities might be significantly lessened.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Recent Work
Title
Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?
Permalink
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3747t3q4
Authors
Rand, J
Hoen, B
Publication Date
2017-07-01
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
Peer reviewed
eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library
University of California

Thirty years of North American wind energy
acceptance research: What have we learned?
Authors:
Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen
Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Electricity Markets and Policy Group
June 2017
This is a pre-print of an article accepted for publication in Energy Research and Social
Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
This work was supported by the Wind Energy Technologies Office within the Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Disclaimer
This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this
document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency
thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty,
express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any
information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately
owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name,
trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the
University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or
reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of
California.
Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity employer.

Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research i
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Wind Energy Technologies Office within the Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The
authors specifically thank Patrick Gilman, Jocelyn Brown-Saracino, and Jose Zayas from the DOE Wind
Energy Technologies Office for supporting this research
The authors would also like to thank Jeremy Firestone (University of Delaware), Ryan Wiser (Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory), Eric Lantz (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), Gundula Hübner
(Martin Luther University), and Jarett Zuboy for their contributions and suggestions to improve this
review.

Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research ii
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................................. i
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................... ii
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................... iii
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background and Motivation ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Justification for North American Focus ..................................................................................................... 2
2. Method of Literature Review ...................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Selection of Publications to Review ............................................................................................................ 3
2.2 Data Collection, Coding, and Qualitative Analysis of Papers ............................................................ 5
3. A Brief History of North American Wind Energy Acceptance Research ................................................... 5
4. Limitations of Previous North American Wind Acceptance Research ...................................................... 7
5. Overarching Aspects and Explanatory Variables in North American Literature ................................ 10
5.1 Socioeconomic Aspects .................................................................................................................................. 10
5.2 Sound Annoyance and Health Risk Perceptions .................................................................................. 12
5.3 Visual/Landscape Aspects, Annoyance, and Place Attachment .................................................... 13
5.4 Environmental Concerns and Attitudes .................................................................................................. 15
5.5 Perceptions of Planning Process, Fairness, and Trust ...................................................................... 16
5.6 Distance from Turbines (Proximity Hypothesis) ................................................................................ 18
5.7 Other Proposed Correlates of Acceptance ............................................................................................. 18
6. Lessons learned in 30 years of wind acceptance studies .............................................................................. 19
7. Knowledge gaps after 30 years: Areas for future research .......................................................................... 21
8. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22
References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Appendix A ............................................................................................................................................................................... 30
Table 1: Explanatory variables in N.A. wind acceptance literature & research suggestions ......... 30
Table 2: Research approaches and methods in North American wind acceptance literature ...... 33

Citations
More filters

An efficient solver for multi-objective onshore wind farm siting and network integration

TL;DR: In this article , an exact solver for the multi-objective optimization of turbine locations and their network connection using a Quota Steiner tree problem is proposed, which makes large problem instances solvable and outperforms generic MIP solvers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparing public support for nuclear and wind energy in Washington State

TL;DR: This article explored whether support for nuclear over wind energy at the state level depends on how people assess the impact of these energy sources on health, local jobs, landscape disruption, and the stability of the electricity supply.
Journal ArticleDOI

A synthetic review of the trust-participation nexus: Towards a relational concept of trust in energy system transformations to net zero

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigate how trust has been defined and conceptualised and how the relationship between participation processes and trust building has been established, concluding that trust has mainly been approached through a narrow theoretical lens, primarily as a key factor for gaining acceptance for specific technology projects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correction to: The Financial and Environmental Consequences of Renewable Energy Exclusion Zones

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors apply the spatially-explicit ADVENT-NEV model to determine the cost imposed on the energy system when either environmental or food production exclusion zones are applied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper evaluated the social acceptance of a typical waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration plant located in Zhejiang province, China and found that the outcome of community acceptance measured by SLO is non-linear but lack institutional trust.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures

TL;DR: The authors show that the Musgrave-Samuelson analysis, which is valid for federal expenditures, need not apply to local expenditures, and restate the assumptions made by Musgrave and Samuelson and the central problems with which they deal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept

TL;DR: The special issue on Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation as mentioned in this paper is a collection of best papers presented at an international research conference held in Tramelan (Switzerland) in February 2006.

IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation

TL;DR: The Working Group III Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN) presents an assessment of the literature on the scientific, technological, environmental, economic and social aspects of the contribution of six renewable energy sources to the mitigation of climate change as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy

TL;DR: A review of existing research on public perceptions of wind energy, where opposition is typically characterized by the NIMBY (not in my back yard) concept, can be found in this paper.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Thirty years of north american wind energy acceptance research: what have we learned?" ?

The efforts of wind energy acceptance researchers over the past 30 years have yielded many important lessons and insights, but much work remains to be done in this space, particularly in the North American context this paper. 

The following are specific areas for future research. Future research should oversample this group and analyze their responses as a group that is distinct from those living further away. Future research should attempt to do so to provide a mechanism for comparison.