scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Torture, terrorism, and the moral prohibition on killing non-combatants.

Alex J. Bellamy
- pp 18-43
TLDR
In this paper, the authors explore the question of why terrorism and torture appear to be linked and explore the strategic-imperative argument that torture is a sometimes unfortunate but necessary response to ticking bomb terrorists, a lesser-evil scenario where governments are forced to chose between the rights of the suspected terrorist and the right of those whose life would be preserved by extracting the necessary information.
Abstract
It is a curious fact that torture and terrorism tend to go hand in hand. When liberal states that would not normally use torture to extract information and confessions are confronted by terrorism, they are often tempted to use the very means that they would normally repudiate: Examples include the UK in Northern Ireland, Spanish authorities in relation to the Basque separatist group Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA), Israel and its various terrorist foes, the French authorities in Algeria, and the USA and its allies in the so-called “War on Terror.” The reverse also seems true; namely, far from stemming the tide of terrorism, the use of torture as a counter-terrorism tool seems to fan the flames. British repression in Northern Ireland coincided with the expansion of the IRA and the increased lethality of its violence. Images of torture at Abu Ghraib in Iraq have helped al-Qaeda recruiters and encouraged the radicalization of Islamic communities in various parts of the world. It is no coincidence, for example, that one of the perpetrators of the failed 2007 bomb attacks on British airports was an Iraqi angered by what he perceived as the mistreatment of his people by the Western occupiers. This chapter seeks to explore the question of why terrorism and torture appear to be linked. I begin by considering the strategic-imperative argument – the claim that torture is a sometimes unfortunate but necessary response to “ticking bomb” terrorists, a lesser-evil scenario where governments are forced to chose between the rights of the suspected terrorist and the right of those whose life would be preserved by extracting the necessary information.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

#FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support

TL;DR: In this article, a large number of Arabic tweets referring to ISIS and classified them as pro-ISIS or anti-ISIS were collected and analyzed using a classifier to predict who will support or oppose the group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Translating Conceptualizations Into Practical Suggestions: What the Literature on Radicalization Can Offer to Practitioners

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore what the research literature on radicalization offers to practitioners who are coming into contact with a group which is potentially vulnerable to radicalization and identify key figures who can play positive roles during the deradicalization process and provide suggestions as to how they might do so.
Posted Content

#FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to Study the Antecedents of ISIS Support

TL;DR: It is shown that ISIS supporters largely differ from ISIS opposition in that the former referred a lot more to Arab Spring uprisings that failed than the latter.
Book ChapterDOI

Perspectives on Torture in South and Southeast Asia

TL;DR: Baldwin this paper argued that no one is born with an understanding of what these words mean, and instead, one gains understanding of these words through experience, and also added that understanding and implementing human rights reform require tremendous individual effort.
Related Papers (5)