scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Transfemoral aortic valve-in-valve implantation with the CoreValve Evolut for small degenerated stented bioprosthesis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The CoreValve prosthesis was successfully implanted in all 4 patients, with no major complications and no mortality at 3-month follow-up exam, however, 2 of the 4 patients developed mildly elevated transvalvular gradients and caution is necessary when considering patients with small degenerated bioprostheses for a valve-in-valve procedure.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation represents one interesting therapeutic option for high-risk surgical patients with degenerated bioprostheses. The procedure is less invasive and can be performed without thoracotomy and general anesthesia, if the femoral approach is used. Until recently, failing small bioprostheses could only be treated percutaneously by underexpanding the CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc) or Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences). Underexpansion of these valves might compromise the hemodynamic performance and potentially limit its durability. Herein, we report our initial experience with the 23 mm CoreValve Evolut in 4 patients with degenerated 21 mm Mitroflow valves. The CoreValve prosthesis was successfully implanted in all 4 patients, with no major complications and no mortality at 3-month follow-up exam. However, 2 of the 4 patients developed mildly elevated transvalvular gradients. Therefore, despite our promising results, caution is necessary when considering patients with small degenerated bioprostheses for a valve-in-valve procedure.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves: An 8-Year Single-Center Experience

TL;DR: Transcatheter VinV for failed surgical bioprosthetic valve dysfunction can be performed safely with a high success rate and minimal early mortality and morbidity, and provides encouraging mid-term clinical outcomes in this high-risk elderly cohort of patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation: a systematic review of literature.

TL;DR: Valve-in-valve implantation can be considered as an acceptable alternative to conventional open heart surgery for elderly high-risk surgical patients with bioprosthetic degeneration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated small Mitroflow bioprosthesis: early and midterm outcomes.

TL;DR: CV or EvR implantation for failed small MF has favourable early and midterm outcomes if a careful risk evaluation and preventive measures for coronary obstruction are adopted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve/Evolut R© for degenerated small versus bigger bioprostheses.

TL;DR: ViV-TAVI with CoreValve/R is demonstrated to be safe and effective in terms of no coronary obstruction and very low mortality up to 3 years despite slightly higher mean transprosthetic gradients especially in very small bioprosthesis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimizing hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valve‐in‐valve implantation in 19‐mm surgical aortic prostheses

TL;DR: To demonstrate the feasibility of achieving good hemodynamic results with valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) for degenerated 19 mm surgical bioprosthetic valves.
Related Papers (5)