scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Understanding Patients’ Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory

TLDR
The findings suggest that NPT is a theoretical framework that facilitates understanding of experiences of health care work at the individual, as well as the organizational, level and lay the foundation for a new target for treatment and quality improvement efforts toward patient-centered care.
Abstract
PURPOSE Our goal was to assess the burden associated with treatment among patients living with chronic heart failure and to determine whether Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a useful framework to help describe the components of treatment burden in these patients. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative interview data, using framework analysis, informed by NPT, to determine the components of patient “work.” Participants were 47 patients with chronic heart failure managed in primary care in the United Kingdom who had participated in an earlier qualitative study about living with this condition. We identified and examined data that fell outside of the coding frame to determine if important concepts or ideas were being missed by using the chosen theoretical framework. RESULTS We were able to identify and describe components of treatment burden as distinct from illness burden using the framework. Treatment burden in chronic heart failure includes the work of developing an understanding of treatments, interacting with others to organize care, attending appointments, taking medications, enacting lifestyle measures, and appraising treatments. Factors that patients reported as increasing treatment burden included too many medications and appointments, barriers to accessing services, fragmented and poorly organized care, lack of continuity, and inadequate communication between health professionals. Patient “work” that fell outside of the coding frame was exclusively emotional or spiritual in nature. CONCLUSIONS We identified core components of treatment burden as reported by patients with chronic heart failure. The findings suggest that NPT is a theoretical framework that facilitates understanding of experiences of health care work at the individual, as well as the organizational, level. Although further exploration and patient endorsement are necessary, our findings lay the foundation for a new target for treatment and quality improvement efforts toward patient-centered care.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.

TL;DR: This work organizes and synthesizes these models by developing an inventory of models used in D&I research, synthesizing this information and providing guidance on how to select a model to inform study design and execution to enable researchers to better identify and select models to inform their D &I work.
Journal ArticleDOI

SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients

TL;DR: An extended model of the SEIPS, SEIPS 2.0 is a new human factors/ergonomics framework for studying and improving health and healthcare that describes how sociotechnical systems shape health-related work done by professionals and non-professionals, independently and collaboratively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings

TL;DR: This review identifies the emerging evidence to support policy for the management of people with multimorbidity and common comorbidities in primary care and community settings and confidence in the results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from low to high certainty.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementation, context and complexity.

TL;DR: An ecological model of the ways that participants in implementation and health improvement processes interact with contexts is presented and it is shown how these processes involve interactions between mechanisms of resource mobilisation, collective action and negotiations with context that contribute to self-organisation in complex adaptive systems.
References
More filters

Qualitative research in health care: analyzing qualitative data

C Pope, +2 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a method for sifting and interpreting large-scale qualitative research data, such as verbatim notes or transcribed recordings of interviews or focus groups, jotted notes and more detailed fieldnotes.
Book

Qualitative Research in Health Care

Mays, +1 more
TL;DR: The Qualitative Research in Health Care as discussed by the authors provides a clear and accessible introduction to conducting and interpreting qualitative research, incorporating new examples, references and chapters relevant for a comprehensive introduction to the subject.

Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?

TL;DR: Results of randomized trials show that effective disease management programs can achieve substantially better outcomes than usual care, the control intervention, and the evidence strongly suggests that ambulatory care systems should be reshaped for this purpose.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of Normalization Process Theory.

TL;DR: The theory focuses on the work of embedding and of sustaining practices within interaction chains, and helps in understanding why some processes seem to lead to a practice becoming normalized while others do not.
Related Papers (5)