scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Understanding Patients’ Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory

TLDR
The findings suggest that NPT is a theoretical framework that facilitates understanding of experiences of health care work at the individual, as well as the organizational, level and lay the foundation for a new target for treatment and quality improvement efforts toward patient-centered care.
Abstract
PURPOSE Our goal was to assess the burden associated with treatment among patients living with chronic heart failure and to determine whether Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a useful framework to help describe the components of treatment burden in these patients. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative interview data, using framework analysis, informed by NPT, to determine the components of patient “work.” Participants were 47 patients with chronic heart failure managed in primary care in the United Kingdom who had participated in an earlier qualitative study about living with this condition. We identified and examined data that fell outside of the coding frame to determine if important concepts or ideas were being missed by using the chosen theoretical framework. RESULTS We were able to identify and describe components of treatment burden as distinct from illness burden using the framework. Treatment burden in chronic heart failure includes the work of developing an understanding of treatments, interacting with others to organize care, attending appointments, taking medications, enacting lifestyle measures, and appraising treatments. Factors that patients reported as increasing treatment burden included too many medications and appointments, barriers to accessing services, fragmented and poorly organized care, lack of continuity, and inadequate communication between health professionals. Patient “work” that fell outside of the coding frame was exclusively emotional or spiritual in nature. CONCLUSIONS We identified core components of treatment burden as reported by patients with chronic heart failure. The findings suggest that NPT is a theoretical framework that facilitates understanding of experiences of health care work at the individual, as well as the organizational, level. Although further exploration and patient endorsement are necessary, our findings lay the foundation for a new target for treatment and quality improvement efforts toward patient-centered care.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of effective heart failure self-care: a systematic review of patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions

TL;DR: A systematic review of 49 studies which examined the views and needs of patients with HF and their caregivers about the nature and determinants of effective HF self-care identifies key drivers of effective self- care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC)

TL;DR: The study showed that implementation of shared decision making is more complex than the delivery of patient decision support interventions to patients, a portrayal that often goes unquestioned.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol

TL;DR: A set of NPT-based measures are developed and validated, to be used to improve the implementation of complex healthcare interventions and have the potential to enhance the chances of their implementation, leading to sustained changes in working practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors that lessen the burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study.

TL;DR: Patients attempt to lessen the experience of treatment burden using a variety of personal, social, and health care resources to provide a more complete picture of how patients fit complex self-care into their daily lives.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century

Alastair Baker
- 17 Nov 2001 - 
TL;DR: Analyzing health care organizations as complex systems, Crossing the Quality Chasm also documents the causes of the quality gap, identifies current practices that impede quality care, and explores how systems approaches can be used to implement change.
Book

Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers

TL;DR: The Foundations of Qualitative Research as mentioned in this paper The applications of qualitative methods to social research are discussed in detail in the context of qualitative research in the field of social science research, with a focus on the use of qualitative data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysing qualitative data

TL;DR: Qualitative research produces large amounts of textual data in the form of transcripts and observational fieldnotes, and the systematic and rigorous preparation and analysis of these data is time consuming and labour intensive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action.

TL;DR: This report highlights the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to adherence, emphasizes system factors that need to be addressed in successfully implementing adherence-enhancing strategies, and provides illustrative examples of the ways in which professionals have contributed in their own fields of expertise including cardiovascular care among other fields.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action:

TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive report entitled Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action w1x was published, focusing on nine chronic conditions and their risk factors.
Related Papers (5)