scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

US national prevalence and correlates of low back and neck pain among adults

TLDR
This study supports the idea of a multidimensional approach to examining low back and neck problems and suggests the need for further research to address potentially modifiable psychological factors and health behaviors in these populations.
Abstract
Objective To estimate the US prevalence and psychological and health behavior correlates of low back pain and/or neck pain. No current US national prevalence estimates of low back and neck pain exist and few studies have investigated the associations between low back and neck pain, psychological factors, and health behaviors in a representative sample of US community dwellers. Methods We analyzed data obtained from adults ages 18 years or older (n = 29,828) who participated in the 2002 National Health Interview Survey, a cross-sectional, population-based survey of US adults. Results The 3-month US prevalence of back and/or neck pain was 31% (low back pain: 34 million, neck pain: 9 million, both back and neck pain: 19 million). Generally, adults with low back and/or neck pain reported more comorbid conditions, exhibited more psychological distress (including serious mental illness), and engaged in more risky health behaviors than adults without either condition. Conclusion Low back and neck pain are critical public health problems. Our study supports the idea of a multidimensional approach to examining low back and neck problems and suggests the need for further research to address potentially modifiable psychological factors and health behaviors in these populations.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Expenditures and Health Status Among Adults With Back and Neck Problems

TL;DR: Age- and sex-adjusted self-reported measures of mental health, physical functioning, work or school limitations, and social limitations among adults with spine problems were worse in 2005 than in 1997, and spine-related expenditures increased substantially from 1997 to 2005, without evidence of corresponding improvement in self-assessed health status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012.

TL;DR: Self-reported pain in U.S. adults was described and individuals with category 3 or 4 pain were likely to have worse health status, to use more health care, and to suffer from more disability than those with less severe pain.
Journal Article

The Association Between Obesity and Low Back Pain : A Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: It is found that overweight and obesity increase the risk of low back pain, and overweight and obesity have the strongest association with seeking care for low backPain and chronicLow back pain.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Epidemiology of neck pain

TL;DR: Most studies indicate a higher incidence of neck pain among women and an increased risk of developing neck pain until the 35-49-year age group, after which the risk begins to decline.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Association Between Obesity and Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis assessed the association between overweight/obesity and low back pain, and found that overweight and obesity increased the risk of low-back pain.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.

TL;DR: The brevity, strong psychometric properties, and ability to discriminate DSM-IV cases from non-cases make the K10 and K6 attractive for use in general-purpose health surveys.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for Serious Mental Illness in the General Population

TL;DR: The brevity and accuracy of the K6 and K10 scales make them attractive screens for SMI, and routine inclusion of either scale in clinical studies would create an important, and heretofore missing, crosswalk between community and clinical epidemiology.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain.

Steven J. Linton
- 01 May 2000 - 
TL;DR: Because the methodologic quality of the studies varied considerably, future research should focus on improving quality and addressing new questions such as the mechanism, the developmental time factor, and the relevance that these risk factors have for intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI

The prevalence of low back pain: A systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998

TL;DR: A systematic literature review of population prevalence studies of low back pain between 1966 and 1998 was conducted to investigate data homogeneity and appropriateness for pooling, and a model using uniform best-practice methods is proposed.
Related Papers (5)