Validity and reliability of a portable isometric mid-thigh clean pull
read more
Citations
Towards a Determination of the Physiological Characteristics Distinguishing Successful Mixed Martial Arts Athletes: A Systematic Review of Combat Sport Literature
Standardization and methodological considerations for the isometric midthigh pull
Effect of Different Onset Thresholds on Isometric Midthigh Pull Force-Time Variables.
CORP: Measurement of upper and lower limb muscle strength and voluntary activation
The Neuromuscular Qualities of Higher- and Lower-Level Mixed-Martial-Arts Competitors.
References
Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.
Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine
Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.
Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer
Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q2. What is the primary training factor for many sports?
The ability for the neuromuscular system to apply force (strength) is considered as theprimary training factor for many sports (28).
Q3. What is the common method used for the quantification of maximal strength in athletic populations?
The isometric mid-thigh clean pull (IMTPf) is a common method used for the quantification of maximal strength in athletic populations (8, 10, 11, 30).
Q4. How many recreationally active males did they have?
Fifteen recreationally active males (23.7±3 y; 78.4±10.27 kg; 1.78± 0.06m), with ≥ 6months of structured resistance training experience, volunteered to participate in this study.
Q5. How many times did the test sessions take?
Testing sessions were conducted at two time points separated by a minimum of 48hours and no longer than 7 days apart (mean=3.64 ± 1.95 d).
Q6. What limitations does the force plate pose to the test?
In particular, the force plate utilized to acquire GRF data can be cost prohibitive and may lack portability, which limits the performance of the test to laboratory settings.
Q7. How many participants did this study use?
In particular, this present study used recreationally active males with only ≥ 6 months of structured resistance training experience.
Q8. What was the protocol for the IMTPf test?
A familiarization protocol involving 3 submaximal attempts at progressively increasing intensities on the IMTPf and IMTPl was included during each testing session.
Q9. What is the method for calculating pRFD?
Peak RFD was measured from a 20ms sampling window, which has been reported to be the most reliable method for calculating pRFD (10).
Q10. What is the explanation for the differences in PF and RFD?
it is well documented that training interventions utilizing closed chain activities are superior for developing strength and RFD influenced capabilities when compared to open chain alternatives.