scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Variation in Physician Spending and Association With Patient Outcomes.

TLDR
The findings suggest policies targeting both physicians and hospitals may be more effective in reducing wasteful spending than policies focusing solely on hospitals.
Abstract
Importance While the substantial variation in health care spending across regions and hospitals is well known, key clinical decisions are ultimately made by physicians. However, the degree to which spending varies across physicians and the clinical consequences of that variation are unknown. Objective To investigate variation in spending across physicians and its association with patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants For this retrospective data analysis, we analyzed a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years and older who were hospitalized with a nonelective medical condition and treated by a general internist between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014. We first quantified the proportion of variation in Medicare Part B spending attributable to hospitals, physicians, and patients. We then examined the association between physician spending and patient outcomes, adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing physicians within the same hospital). Our primary analysis focused on hospitalist physicians, whose patients are plausibly quasirandomized within a hospital based on physician work schedule. A secondary analysis focused on general internists overall. To ensure that patient illness severity did not directly affect physician spending estimates, we calculated physicians’ spending levels in 2011 through 2012 and examined outcomes of their patients in 2013 and 2014. Exposures Physicians’ adjusted Part B spending level in 2011 through 2012. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients’ 30-day mortality and readmission rates in 2013 and 2014. Results To determine the amount of variation across physicians we included 485 016 hospitalizations treated by 21 963 physicians at 2837 acute care hospitals for the analysis of hospitalists and 839 512 hospitalizations treated by 50 079 physicians at 3195 acute care hospitals for the analysis of general internists. Variation in spending across physicians within hospital was larger than variation across hospitals (for hospitalists, 8.4% across physicians vs 7.0% across hospitals; for general internists, 10.5% across physicians vs 6.2% across hospitals). Higher physician spending was not associated with lower 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for additional $100 in physician spending, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P  = .47) or readmissions (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P  = .54) for hospitalists within the same hospital. We observed similar patterns among general internists. Conclusions and Relevance Health care spending varies more across individual physicians than across hospitals. However, higher physician spending is not associated with better outcomes of hospitalized patients. Our findings suggest policies targeting both physicians and hospitals may be more effective in reducing wasteful spending than policies focusing solely on hospitals.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Socioeconomic Status and Access to Healthcare: Interrelated Drivers for Healthy Aging.

TL;DR: This mini-review elucidate the complex factors affecting the relationship between chronological age, socio-economic status, access to care, and healthy aging using a SES-focused framework and offers recommendations for research-guided action to remediate the trend of older age being associated with lower SES, lack of access to Care, and poorer health outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study

TL;DR: Within the same hospital, patients treated by older physicians had higher mortality than patients cared for by younger physicians, except those physicians treating high volumes of patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial☆

TL;DR: A multifaceted, physician-led, low-intensity CQI effort can improve the adoption of care processes into national practice within the context of a medical specialty society infrastructure.
Journal ArticleDOI

What's up doc? A national cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland.

TL;DR: The work hours of doctors working in Irish hospitals were in excess of European Working Time Directive’s requirements and just over half of hospital doctors in Ireland had positive well-being, which is likely to be a barrier to accessing care.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

TL;DR: The present method addresses some of the limitations of previous measures and produces an expanded set of comorbidities that easily is applied without further refinement to administrative data for a wide range of diseases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery

TL;DR: Numbers show prima facie inequalities in the input of resources that are associated with income transfer from areas of lower expenditure to areas of higher expenditure, which indicates that there is considerable uncertainty about the effectiveness of different levels of aggregate, as well as specific kinds of, health services.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care

TL;DR: A cohort study in four parallel cohorts using end-of-life care spending as an indicator of Medicare spending and examined costs and outcomes of care for hip fracture, colorectal cancer, and acute myocardial infarction to determine whether the increased spending in high-cost regions results in better care or improved health.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care

TL;DR: The researchers examined costs and outcomes of care for hip fracture, colorectal cancer, and acute myocardial infarction using end-of-life care spending as an indicator of Medicare spending and carried out a cohort study in four parallel populations using a natural randomization approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

PRACTITIONERS’ CORNER: Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within‐groups Estimators*

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use standard packages to calculate heteroskedasticity and serial correlation consistent standard errors for within-groups estimators of a linear regression model from panel data.
Related Papers (5)