scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Varieties of Capitalism

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A number of schemas have been proposed to explain why countries have often been able to secure substantial rates of growth in different ways, often with relatively egalitarian distributions of income as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
Scholarship on varieties of capitalism (VofC) explores the ways in which the institutions structuring the political economy affect patterns of economic performance or policy making and the distribution of well-being. Contesting the claim that there is one best route to superior economic performance, a number of schemas have been proposed to explain why countries have often been able to secure substantial rates of growth in different ways, often with relatively egalitarian distributions of income. Prominent among them is a VofC analysis focused on the developed democracies that distinguishes liberal and coordinated market economies according to the ways in which firms coordinate their endeavors. On the basis of institutional complementarities among subspheres of the political economy, it suggests that the institutional structure of the political economy confers comparative institutional advantages, notably for radical and incremental innovation, which explains why economies have not converged in the context of globalization. Although this framework is contested, it has inspired new research on many subjects, including the basis for innovation, the determinants of social policy, the grounds for international negotiation, and the character of institutional change. In this issue area, there is promising terrain for further research into the origins of varieties of capitalism, the factors that drive institutional change in the political economy, how institutional arrangements in the subspheres of the political economy interact with one another, the normative underlay for capitalism, and the effects of varieties of capitalism on multiple dimensions of well-being. Keywords: capitalism; political economy; globalization; politics; institutional change; economic growth; macroeconomics; innovation; complementarities; social policy

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK

TL;DR: The relative success of firms in fields with different appropriability and competence destruction risks is likely to vary between countries with contrasting patterns of labour market organisation as mentioned in this paper, and the relative significance of these varies between different sub-sectors, and so do managerial ways of dealing with them.
Journal ArticleDOI

De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce two relevant theories of de-globalization from political science, liberalism and realism, and discuss the resulting opportunities in three areas of IB research: political strategies and roles of multinational enterprises (MNEs), global value chains, and the role of the national context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Standardization of Organizational Forms and Management Practices? What New Institutionalism and the Business‐Systems Approach Can Learn from Each Other*

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on two institutionalist traditions in organization theory which make a significant contribution to this discussion: new institutionalism and the business-systems approach, emphasizing the adaptation of organizations to their institutional environments but come to very different conclusions as to the global standardization of organizational forms and management practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe

TL;DR: In this article, the authors reveal the importance of institutional factors and economic and demographic attributes to variations in regional entrepreneurial attitude and activity, and point out the relevance of distinguishing between components of entrepreneurial attitudes, i.e. fear of failure in starting business, perceptions on start-up opportunities and self-assessment of personal capabilities to start a firm.
References
More filters
Posted Content

The Diversity of Modern Capitalism

Bruno Amable
- 01 Jan 2003 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider why institutional forms of modern capitalist economies differ internationally, and propose a typology of capitalism based on the theory of institutional complementarity, which is the outcome of socio-political compromises.
Book Chapter

Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state

TL;DR: The authors argue that workers will only make such risky investments when they have some insurance that their job or income is secure, otherwise, they will invest in general, and therefore portable, skills.
Journal ArticleDOI

Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis

TL;DR: This paper provided a statistical analysis of core contentions of the "varieties of capitalism" perspective on comparative capitalism and constructed indices to assess whether patterns of co-ordination in the OECD economies conform to the predictions of the theory and compared the correspondence of institutions across subspheres of the political economy.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences

TL;DR: The authors argue that individuals who have made risky investments in skills will demand insurance against the possible future loss of income from those investments, and they test the theory on public opinion data for eleven advanced democracies and suggest how differences in educational systems can explain cross-national differences in the level of social protection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the existing wide variation in electoral rules across nations can be traced to the strategic decisions that the current ruling parties, anticipating the coordinating consequences of different electoral regimes, make to maximize their representation according to the following conditions.