scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

What Is Ignorance

Rik Peels
- 01 Jan 2010 - 
- Vol. 38, Iss: 1, pp 57-67
TLDR
In this paper, it was shown that being ignorant is not equivalent to failing to know, at least not on one of the stronger senses of knowledge, and that one's definition of ignorance crucially depends on one's account of belief.
Abstract
This article offers an analysis of ignorance. After a couple of preliminary remarks, I endeavor to show that, contrary to what one might expect and to what nearly all philosophers assume, being ignorant is not equivalent to failing to know, at least not on one of the stronger senses of knowledge. Subsequently, I offer two definitions of ignorance and argue that one’s definition of ignorance crucially depends on one’s account of belief. Finally, I illustrate the relevance of my analysis by paying attention to four philosophical problems in which ignorance plays a crucial role.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Evaluating Media Literacy Education: Concepts, Theories and Future Directions

TL;DR: This article argued that media literacy is mostly defined in terms of the knowledge and skills individuals need to analyze, evaluate, or produce media messages, which mainly relate to four key facets of the mass media phenomenon.
Journal ArticleDOI

Homo Ignorans – Deliberately Choosing Not to Know

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that deliberate ignorance has important functions and is systematized, which describes types of deliberate ignorance, describe their functions, discuss their normative desirability, and consider how they can be modeled.
Journal ArticleDOI

On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels

TL;DR: The authors defend the "Standard View of Ignorance" according to which ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge, and some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ignorance is Lack of True Belief: A Rejoinder to Le Morvan

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the distinction between dispositional and non-dispositional accounts of belief is correct as it stands, and criticize the viability and importance of Le Morvan's distinction between propositional and factive ignorance.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Kind of Ignorance Excuses? Two Neglected Issues

TL;DR: In this article, the authors formulate and defend an answer to two questions that have not yet been discussed in the literature on exculpatory ignorance: which kinds of propositional attitudes that count as ignorance provide an excuse, and ignorance of which propositions counts as an excuse.
References
More filters
Book

The Concept of Mind

TL;DR: This epoch-making book cuts through confused thinking and forces us to re-examine many cherished ideas about knowledge, imagination, consciousness and the intellect as mentioned in this paper, and the result is a classic example of philosophy.
Book

The Problems of Philosophy

TL;DR: This book succinctly states Russell's views on a whole range of questions, from material reality and idealism to the distinctions between knowledge, error, and probable opinion, and the limits and the value of philosophical knowledge.
Book

Epistemology and Cognition

TL;DR: Theoretical foundations for epistemology and cognitive science have been discussed in this paper, including the Elements of Epistemology, Skepticism, Rationality, and Belief Updating.
Book

Knowledge in a Social World

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the role of technology in the emergence of the Internet and its role in post-moderation resistance, and discuss the importance of technology and technology in education.
Trending Questions (1)
What is ignorance?

The paper provides an analysis of ignorance and argues that being ignorant is not equivalent to failing to know. It offers two definitions of ignorance and discusses its relevance in philosophical problems.