scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping

Richard K. Olson, +1 more
- 01 Mar 1970 - 
- Vol. 83, Iss: 1, pp 1
TLDR
Wertheimer as discussed by the authors investigated the effectiveness of configurational or textural variables in producing similarity grouping by measuring the time it took Ss to locate the disparate quadrant in a circular array.
Abstract
The effectiveness of several configurational or textural variables in producing similarity grouping was investigated by measuring the time it took Ss to locate the disparate quadrant in a circular array. The 'figure' and 'ground' quadrants differed in (1) slope of elements, (2) linearity of elements, or (3) the way in which the same slopes were combined into angles. Differences in slope produced excellent grouping; differences in linearity were less effective; and differences in arrangement of slopes were generally quite ineffective. Grouping was also dependent on orientation of the whole array: horizontals and verticals gave better grouping than diagonals, and even arrangement of slopes gave moderately effective grouping when angles with horizontal and vertical axes of symmetry were opposed to each other. Conditions of head tilt were used to determine whether the grouping effects were dependent on retinal or gravitational orientation. For the angles, only retinal orientation seemed important; but for line segments and paired dots varying in slope, both retinal and gravitational orientation had significant effects. The results disconfirm the hypothesis that grouping occurs entirely on a projection level, independently of constancy mechanisms. It is suggested that grouping and segregation depend on identities and differences between descriptors which in turn represent relationships between the stimulus array and an internal Cartesian reference system. Similarity is one of the most important of Wertheimer's principles of perceptual grouping, but only recently, with the work of Julesz and Beck, has any appreciable curiosity been displayed about the kinds of similarity that are effective in this respect.' It should, of course, be understood that grouping always implies the complementary process of segregation. Grouped items must be at once similar to one another and different from extraneous items; in analysis-of-variance terminology, within-group variance must be Received for publication September 22, 1969. The research was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant 973-66) and in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense (Contract F44620-67C-0099). 1 M. Wertheimer, Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, Psychol. Forsch., 4, 1923, 301-350; B. Julesz, Texture and visual perception, Sci. Amer., 212, 1965, 38-48; J. Beck, Perceptual grouping produced by line figures, Percept. & Psychophys., 2, 1967, 491-495.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

Attention and Effort

Journal ArticleDOI

Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.

TL;DR: The effects of perceptual grouping on search for targets defined by separate features or by conjunction of features is explored, suggesting that preattentive grouping creates separate feature maps within each separable dimension rather than one global configuration.
Journal ArticleDOI

A short-range process in apparent motion

TL;DR: Perceptual segregation in an alternated pair of random-dot patterns was perceived as a segregated, coherently moving shape only if the displacement was small, while classical apparent motion with larger displacements involves a different process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Texture discrimination by Gabor functions

TL;DR: In this article, a 2D Gabor filter was used for texture discrimination in the striate cortex of the human brain. And the performance of the computer models suggests that cortical neurons with Gabor like receptive fields may be involved in preattentive texture discrimination.