scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Will My Patient Fall

TLDR
Screening for risk of falling during the clinical examination begins with determining if the patient has fallen in the past year, and patients who have not previously fallen or who have a gait or balance problem are at higher risk of future falls.
Abstract
ContextEffective multifactorial interventions reduce the frequent falling rate of older patients by 30% to 40%. However, clinical consensus suggests reserving these interventions for high-risk patients. Limiting fall prevention programs to high-risk patients implies that clinicians must recognize features that predict future falls.ObjectiveTo identify the prognostic value of risk factors for future falls among older patients.Data Sources and Study SelectionSearch of MEDLINE (1966-September 2004), CINAHL (1982-September 2004), and authors' own files to identify prospective cohort studies of risk factors for falls that performed a multivariate analysis of such factors.Data ExtractionTwo reviewers independently determined inclusion of articles and assessed study quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Included studies were those identifying the prognostic value of risk factors for future falls among community-dwelling persons 65 years and older. Clinically identifiable risk factors were identified across 6 domains: orthostatic hypotension, visual impairment, impairment of gait or balance, medication use, limitations in basic or instrumental activities of daily living, and cognitive impairment.Data SynthesisEighteen studies met inclusion criteria and provided a multivariate analysis including at least 1 of the risk factor domains. The estimated pretest probability of falling at least once in any given year for individuals 65 years and older was 27% (95% confidence interval, 19%-36%). Patients who have fallen in the past year are more likely to fall again [likelihood ratio range, 2.3-2.8]. The most consistent predictors of future falls are clinically detected abnormalities of gait or balance (likelihood ratio range, 1.7-2.4). Visual impairment, medication variables, decreased activities of daily living, and impaired cognition did not consistently predict falls across studies. Orthostatic hypotension did not predict falls after controlling for other factors.ConclusionsScreening for risk of falling during the clinical examination begins with determining if the patient has fallen in the past year. For patients who have not previously fallen, screening consists of an assessment of gait and balance. Patients who have fallen or who have a gait or balance problem are at higher risk of future falls.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effective Exercise for the Prevention of Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: The effects of exercise on falls prevention in older people and whether particular trial characteristics or components of exercise programs are associated with larger reductions in falls are investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature.

TL;DR: The major risk factors identified are impaired balance and gait, polypharmacy, and history of previous falls, which include advancing age, female gender, visual impairments, cognitive decline especially attention and executive dysfunction, and environmental factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk Factors for Falls in Community-dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TL;DR: This meta-analysis provides comprehensive evidence-based assessment of risk factors for falls in older people, confirming their multifactorial etiology and finding some nonspecific indicators of high baseline risk were also strong predictors of the risk of falling.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Patient Who Falls: “It’s Always a Trade-off”

TL;DR: Using the case of an older man who has experienced multiple falls and a hip fracture, the consequences and etiology of falls are addressed; the evidence on predisposing factors and effective interventions are summarized; and how to translate this evidence into patient care is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantitative Gait Markers and Incident Fall Risk in Older Adults

TL;DR: Quantitative gait markers are independent predictors of falls in older adults and should be further studied to improve current fall risk assessments and to develop new interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

“Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

TL;DR: A simplified, scored form of the cognitive mental status examination, the “Mini-Mental State” (MMS) which includes eleven questions, requires only 5-10 min to administer, and is therefore practical to use serially and routinely.

A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

TL;DR: The Mini-Mental State (MMS) as mentioned in this paper is a simplified version of the standard WAIS with eleven questions and requires only 5-10 min to administer, and is therefore practical to use serially and routinely.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

M. P. Lawton, +1 more
- 21 Sep 1969 - 
TL;DR: Two scales first standardized on their own population are presented, one of which taps a level of functioning heretofore inadequately represented in attempts to assess everyday functional competence, and the other taps a schema of competence into which these behaviors fit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

TL;DR: It is concluded that falls among older persons living in the community are common and that a simple clinical assessment can identify the elderly persons who are at the greatest risk of falling.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research and suggest that claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.
Related Papers (5)