scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Writing biomedical manuscripts part I: fundamentals and general rules.

AE Ohwovoriole
- 01 May 2011 - 
- Vol. 30, Iss: 3, pp 151-157
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The purpose of this article is to arm and encourage potential biomedical authors with tools and rules that will enable them to write contemporary manuscripts, which can stand the rigorous peer review process.
Abstract
It is a professional obligation for health researchers to investigate and communicate their findings to the medical community. The writing of a publishable scientific manuscript can be a daunting task for the beginner and to even some established researchers. Many manuscripts fail to get off the ground and/or are rejected. The writing task can be made easier and the quality improved by using and following simple rules and leads that apply to general scientific writing .The manuscript should follow a standard structure:(e.g. (Abstract) plus Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion/Conclusion, the IMRAD model. The authors must also follow well established fundamentals of good communication in science and be systematic in approach. The manuscript must move from what is currently known to what was unknown that was investigated using a hypothesis, research question or problem statement. Each section has its own style of structure and language of presentation. The beginning of writing a good manuscript is to do a good study design and to pay attention to details at every stage. Many manuscripts are rejected because of errors that can be avoided if the authors follow simple guidelines and rules. One good way to avoid potential disappointment in manuscript writing is to follow the established general rules along with those of the journal in which the paper is to be published. An important injunction is to make the writing precise, clear, parsimonious, and comprehensible to the intended audience. The purpose of this article is to arm and encourage potential biomedical authors with tools and rules that will enable them to write contemporary manuscripts, which can stand the rigorous peer review process. The expectations of standard journals, and common pitfalls the major elements of a manuscript are covered.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tips for charting the course of a successful health research career

TL;DR: Based on the collective experiences of some young researchers and research mentors, some tips for a successful health career are described and some useful resources are offered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Writing biomedical manuscripts part II: standard elements and common errors.

TL;DR: To succeed follow the universal rules of writing and those of the target journal rules while avoiding those errors that are easily amenable to correction before you submit your manuscript.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is the English language a barrier to the non-English-speaking authors in academic publishing?

TL;DR: The main limiting factors found in the study has been limited skills in English writing and editing, which enhances knowledge on recent advances and management options about a particular condition which can be applied in the care of patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

On Writing and Reviewing

Endre Bihari
- 05 Dec 2018 - 
TL;DR: The dual creatorship concept is expanded and shown in its practicality during the multiphased writing process and advice is given to aspiring writers from a practitioner's point of view.

W riting Biomedical Manuscripts Part II: Standard Elements and Common Errors Rédaction biomédicale partie manuscrits II: Eléments standard et erreurs communes

TL;DR: The chances of manuscript acceptance can be increased by paying attention to the standard elements and avoiding or correcting the common errors that make for the rejection of manuscripts.
References
More filters
Book

Qualitative Research in Health Care

Mays, +1 more
TL;DR: The Qualitative Research in Health Care as discussed by the authors provides a clear and accessible introduction to conducting and interpreting qualitative research, incorporating new examples, references and chapters relevant for a comprehensive introduction to the subject.
BookDOI

Qualitative research in health care

TL;DR: The full revised and updated edition of Qualitative Research in Health Care as discussed by the authors offers a clear and accessible introduction to conducting and interpreting qualitative research, incorporating new examples, references and chapters relevant for a comprehensive introduction to the subject.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting Why Investigators Fail to Publish

TL;DR: Study characteristics do not predict attempts to publish research submitted to a scientific meeting, and investigators whose research is rejected by a meeting are pessimistic about chances for publication and may make less effort to publish.
Journal Article

The Science of Scientific Writing

TL;DR: The authors argue that complexity of thought need not lead to impenetrability of expression, and demonstrate a number of rhetorical principles that can produce clarity in communication without oversimplifying scientific issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.

TL;DR: While overstating the results and applying the wrong statistics can be fixed, other problems that the reviewers identified (ignoring the literature, designing poor studies, choosing inappropriate instruments, and writing poor manuscripts) are likely to be fatal flaws warranting rejection.