scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Any article about immunohistochemistry of macrophage M1 and M2 in lung? 


Best insight from top research papers

Immunohistochemistry studies on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in lung cancer reveal the complexity of macrophage phenotypes. These studies highlight the heterogeneity of TAM populations, with a predominance of M2-like macrophages in lung tumors, especially at the invasive margin. The expression of M1 and M2 gene signatures in TAMs is not mutually exclusive, as some TAMs can exhibit both profiles simultaneously. Notably, the presence of M1hot TAMs, expressing both M1 and M2-like signatures, is associated with better outcomes in early lung cancer, potentially recruiting tissue-resident memory T cells and enhancing antitumor responses. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the density, spatial distribution, and gene expression of TAM phenotypes through immunohistochemistry for prognostic evaluation in lung cancer.

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
The research paper discusses the immunohistochemistry of the tumor-associated macrophage M2 complex in lung adenocarcinoma, highlighting its impact on morphological changes and cancer cell interactions.
The research paper explores the spatial density and distribution of M1 and M2 tumor-associated macrophages in non-small cell lung carcinoma, highlighting their prognostic value for overall survival.
The research paper discusses optimized staining of macrophages in human lung tumors, focusing on pan-macrophage markers like CD68 and markers for M2 macrophages such as CD163 and CD206.
###M1hot TAMs in lung cancer display M1 and M2 gene signatures simultaneously. M1hot TAMs correlate with increased tissue-resident memory T cells infiltration and improved survival outcomes.###

Related Questions

How can i target m1 macrophages?4 answersTo target M1 macrophages, various strategies can be employed based on the data from the provided contexts. One approach involves utilizing fluorescent probes like CDr17, which selectively stain M1 macrophages over M2 or M0, aiding in tracking them in vivo. Another method is through the use of polymeric nanocarriers that target macrophages, particularly focusing on the mannose receptor for polarization. Additionally, the inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway has been shown to selectively eliminate M2 macrophages, thereby increasing the M1/M2 macrophage ratio in the tumor microenvironment. These approaches highlight the potential for targeted therapies to modulate macrophage polarization states for various applications, including inflammatory diseases and cancer immunotherapy.
What have others used to polarize macrophages into M2?5 answersResearchers have employed various methods to polarize macrophages into the M2 phenotype. One approach involved utilizing long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) modulation, specifically upregulating lncRNA-MM2P during M2 polarization, which was found to be crucial for promoting tumorigenesis. Another study focused on the role of taurine in regulating M2 macrophage polarization through mitophagy, demonstrating that taurine can prevent excessive M2 polarization by affecting mitochondrial dynamics and polarization marker expression. Additionally, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was identified as a factor that can stimulate M0 macrophages to polarize into M2 macrophages, inhibiting M1 macrophages from phagocytizing hepatocellular carcinoma cells, possibly through the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. These diverse strategies shed light on the complex mechanisms involved in macrophage polarization towards the M2 phenotype.
What specific markers distinguish M1 and M2 macrophages?5 answersDistinct markers that differentiate M1 and M2 macrophages include gene expression profiles and surface markers. M1 macrophages are characterized by upregulated expression of Il12a, Tnf, Il6, Il1b, and Nos2, while M2 macrophages exhibit increased levels of Mrc1, Cd163, Ccl17, Arg, and Tgfb1. Additionally, M1 macrophages are identified by the presence of CD80, whereas M2 macrophages express CD206. Furthermore, M1 macrophages are associated with a higher ratio of CD68+iNOS+ cells compared to CD68+CD163+ cells, indicating a predominance of M1 markers in wounds aged 2-5 days. These markers play a crucial role in distinguishing the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype from the anti-inflammatory and tissue-regenerative M2 phenotype in macrophages.
Is there any approch converting M2macrophages to M1 macrophages in tumor environment?3 answersReprogramming M2-type macrophages into M1-like macrophages in the tumor microenvironment is a potential approach for cancer therapy. Several studies have investigated different methods to achieve this conversion. Ghalavand et al. used purified rapamycin-texosomes to induce M2 to M1 macrophage polarization in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Guo et al. proposed a mathematical model to study the effect of M2 re-polarization on tumor growth and found that increasing the M2 re-polarization rate can control tumor growth and even eliminate the tumor. Vadevoo et al. used epigenetic therapy with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and trichostatin A (TSA) to reprogram M2-type macrophages into an M1-like phenotype. Muncan demonstrated that combined epigenetic and polyamine-reducing therapy can stimulate M1 macrophage polarization in the tumor microenvironment, leading to decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival. Yuan et al. developed an M2-like macrophage-targeting nanoprobe to visualize the migration and polarization of M2-like macrophages in real-time, providing insights into their role in tumor metastasis.
What induces M1 or M2 polarization states in macrophages \?4 answersM1 or M2 polarization states in macrophages can be induced by various factors. In the context of colorectal tumors, tumor-secreted glucose-regulatory protein 78 (GRP78) enters macrophages and promotes M2 polarization. Arsenic treatment has been shown to induce the repolarization of classically activated (M1) macrophages to M2 macrophages through the autophagy/mitophagy pathway. Brucella infection induces macrophage transformation from M1 to M2-type, and this polarization is regulated by Signal transducers and activators of transcription 6 (STAT6). Periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) can induce M2 macrophage polarization through the JNK pathway. In autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, the balance between M1 and M2 activation influences the occurrence of T-helper (Th)1 or Th2 responses.
How can I do immunohistochemistry?3 answersImmunohistochemistry is a technique used to visualize and observe specific substances in cells and tissues. It combines morphology and biochemistry by using antibodies that specifically bind to antigens and visualizing the site of the antigen-antibody reaction microscopically. The process involves several important steps. Firstly, a good primary antibody is needed to detect the target antigen clearly and reproducibly. Secondly, fixation is performed to immobilize the antigens in tissues and cells, although it can affect the molecular structure of the antigen. Lastly, visualization is crucial, requiring specific and clear detection methods. Control experiments are also important to ensure accurate results. Immunohistochemistry is widely used in dermatologic diagnostics and research, with applications in diagnosing skin tumors, lymphoma, and detecting infectious microorganisms. Detailed methods for labeling proteins in cells and tissues, as well as troubleshooting guidelines, are available. The technique is highly sensitive and specific, allowing the detection of a wide variety of antigens in multiple animal species. Immunohistochemistry is an important tool for diagnostic purposes and guiding targeted therapies in neoplastic cells.

See what other people are reading

Ferroptosis representative inducer and inhibitor?
4 answers
A representative ferroptosis inducer is hinokitiol complexed with iron to form Fe(hino)3, which exhibits potent ferroptosis-inducing capabilities by boosting lipid peroxidation and reducing tumor sizes in triple-negative breast cancer models. On the other hand, a notable ferroptosis inhibitor is compound 26a, which selectively inhibits glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and effectively induces ferroptosis with significant tumor growth suppression in a mouse xenograft model. These findings highlight the diverse strategies employed to modulate ferroptosis for therapeutic purposes, emphasizing the importance of understanding the mechanisms and key targets involved in this iron-dependent form of programmed cell death.
Ferroptosis strong inducer and inhibitor?
5 answers
Various compounds have been identified as strong inducers and inhibitors of ferroptosis, a unique iron-dependent form of cell death. Hinokitiol complexed with iron (Fe(hino)3) is a potent ferroptosis inducer, increasing efficiency significantly. Additionally, manganese molybdate nanoparticles (MnMoOx NPs) have been shown to trigger ferroptosis, enhancing tumor immunotherapy. A selective ferroptosis inducer, compound 26a, inhibits glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and effectively induces ferroptosis with high selectivity. On the other hand, various inhibitors of ferroptosis have been developed, targeting key regulators like GPX4 and System Xc −. These findings highlight the importance of understanding both inducers and inhibitors of ferroptosis for potential therapeutic interventions in diseases like cancer and epilepsy.
Do cathepsin d levels differ in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors?
5 answers
Cathepsin-D levels indeed differ between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Studies have shown that malignant tumors exhibit significantly higher expression of cathepsin-D compared to benign tumors, indicating its potential as a marker for aggressive behavior and invasive potential in salivary gland neoplasms. Additionally, the distribution patterns of cathepsin-D in various histologic types of salivary gland tumors have been examined, with a notable increase in expression in salivary gland carcinomas compared to benign mixed tumors. These findings suggest that cathepsin-D expression levels can serve as a distinguishing factor between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors, highlighting its importance in diagnostic and prognostic assessments in this context.
Do defencin have role in periodontitis from salivary samples?
5 answers
Defensins, specifically human beta-defensins (hBDs), play a crucial role in periodontitis as indicated by various studies on salivary samples. These peptides are involved in host defense mechanisms, enhancing both innate and adaptive immune responses. Salivary concentrations of hBD-2 have been linked to periodontal disease in non-HIV-infected individuals, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for periodontitis. Furthermore, smoking has been shown to impact the levels of hBDs in periodontitis patients, with smokers exhibiting altered hBD 1 and 2 levels compared to non-smokers, indicating a potential influence of risk factors on defensin expression in the oral cavity. While defensins like hBDs are recognized for their antimicrobial properties, their exact role as salivary biomarkers in periodontitis is still under investigation.
How does NLRP1 contribute to immune evasion in cancer cells?
5 answers
NLRP1 plays a crucial role in immune evasion in cancer cells by mediating inflammation and influencing immune responses. In melanoma, NLRP1 activation leads to IL-1β secretion and NF-κB activity, contributing to acquired resistance to temozolomide (TMZ). Furthermore, aberrant inflammasome activation, including NLRP1, can support or suppress tumor development in a cell-type and stage-dependent manner. NLRP1 activation in human skin promotes the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) by inducing inflammation, while in established cSCCs, it may have a tumor-suppressor role. This dual role of NLRP1 in cancer highlights its complex functions and potential as a target for novel cancer prevention and therapy strategies.
What pathways are discussed in tcga-acc?
5 answers
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project provides valuable insights into various cancer types, including Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC). Several pathways have been discussed in the context of TCGA data analysis. These pathways include signaling pathways, such as those analyzed using Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA), as well as pathways related to gene expression abnormalities in lung cancer, like the cell cycle and viral carcinogenesis pathways. Additionally, tools like CDPath have been used to discover cooperative driver pathways in TCGA datasets, such as breast cancer (BRCA) and endometrial cancer (UCEC). Therefore, TCGA data analysis encompasses a wide range of pathways that play crucial roles in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development, including those relevant to Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
How does defensin contribute to the development and progression of periodontitis?
4 answers
Defensins, particularly β-defensins and α-defensins, play crucial roles in periodontitis. These cationic peptides are involved in innate immune defense, antimicrobial activity, and immunoregulation. Studies have shown that defensins like human β-defensin-1 (HBD-1) and α-defensin 1 (DEFA-1) are associated with periodontal disease progression. Defensins aid in maintaining homeostasis in periodontal tissues by contributing to the immune response and acting as antimicrobial agents. Specifically, DEFA-1 has been identified as a potential diagnostic target for periodontitis, with its levels being higher in periodontitis patients compared to healthy individuals. These peptides can modulate osteoclast activity, affecting bone resorption and the progression of periodontal disease. Overall, defensins' multifaceted functions highlight their significant contribution to the development and progression of periodontitis.
What are the functions and characteristics of the different types of dendritic cells?
5 answers
Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial in immune responses, acting as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. They are heterogeneous, with subsets like conventional DCs (cDC) and monocyte-derived DCs (MoDC). DCs recognize, phagocytose, and present antigens to T cells, determining immune activation. DC subsets include classic DCs for antigen processing and plasmacytoid DCs with high phagocytic activity and cytokine production capacity. DCs express various receptors aiding in pathogen clearance and are vital in antiviral responses, producing type I interferons. Different DC subsets have unique functions, such as activating lymphocytes, producing cytokines, and presenting antigens to T cells, essential for immune response initiation and pathogen defense.
What is the prevalence of adenocarcinoma gastrico in the Mayan population?
5 answers
The prevalence of gastric adenocarcinoma, a significant health concern worldwide, varies by region and is influenced by dietary, environmental, and genetic factors. While the contexts provided do not directly address the prevalence of gastric adenocarcinoma specifically in the Mayan population, they offer insights into the broader epidemiology and characteristics of gastric cancer in regions with high Mayan populations, such as Guatemala and Mexico, which can indirectly inform about the Mayan population. In Guatemala, gastric cancer is the most frequent neoplasia of the digestive tract, with high incidence and mortality rates. Helicobacter pylori, particularly strains expressing the CagA virulence factor, has been identified as a gastric carcinogen, associated with atrophic lesions and precancerous conditions in this region. This suggests a significant burden of gastric cancer, potentially affecting the Mayan population given their substantial presence in Guatemala. In Mexico, variations in gastric cancer incidence are attributed to specific dietary, environmental, and genetic patterns, which could also apply to the Mayan communities within the country. The state of Chiapas, with a high Mayan population, has been highlighted for its high poverty rate and association with gastric cancer mortality, suggesting a correlation between socioeconomic factors and the disease. This is further supported by the finding that gastric cancer in Mexico is often diagnosed in advanced stages, underscoring the need for prevention and early detection strategies that would be relevant for the Mayan population as well. Moreover, the histological classification of gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma, indicates that the diffuse type, which has a worse prognosis, is more prevalent in Mexican patients. This information, while not Mayan-specific, provides a backdrop against which the impact of gastric adenocarcinoma on the Mayan population can be considered, given their significant numbers in regions of high gastric cancer incidence and mortality. In summary, while direct data on the prevalence of gastric adenocarcinoma in the Mayan population is not provided, the contexts suggest a significant burden of gastric cancer in regions with substantial Mayan populations, influenced by H. pylori infection, socioeconomic factors, and potentially specific genetic predispositions.
Diference difference between Notch 1 and Notch 2 in NSC?
5 answers
NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 play distinct roles in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Research indicates that NOTCH1 inhibition leads to substantial cell death in NSCLC cells, while NOTCH2 deletion results in increased carcinogenesis and aggressive tumor growth. Moreover, high levels of active NOTCH1 can induce a shift from EGFR to NOTCH1 dependence, causing resistance to EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC. Additionally, NOTCH2NL, a novel gene involved in radiation resistance in NSCLC, impacts canonical Notch signaling, regulates MYC expression, and increases MYC pathway activity. Furthermore, Notch expression patterns vary in NSCLC subtypes, with adenocarcinoma showing higher NOTCH2 expression and squamous cell carcinoma exhibiting elevated NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 levels, influencing disease progression and recurrence. In summary, NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 have distinct functions in NSCLC, with implications for tumor behavior and treatment response.
What is the effect of elocta on arthropaty?
5 answers
Elocta, also known as efmoroctocog alfa, has shown positive effects on arthropathy in hemophilia A patients. When compared to previous treatments, patients receiving Elocta experienced reduced weekly concentrate doses and administration frequency, leading to stable or improved bleeding rates and joint health scores. Additionally, lenalidomide, a different treatment, has demonstrated the ability to inhibit the proliferation of synovial cells, promote apoptosis, and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in hemophilic arthropathy in mice models. Furthermore, ethanolic extract of Delonix elata has shown anti-arthritic activity by reducing paw swelling and hind limb bone mass in arthritic rats. These findings collectively suggest that Elocta and other treatments like lenalidomide and Delonix elata extract can positively impact arthropathy in hemophilia A patients and animal models.