scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Answers from top 6 papers

More filters
Papers (6)Insight
Our results suggest that the brains of great apes also scale linearly in their numbers of neurons like other primate brains, including humans.
These observations support the idea that humans have cells that resemble MNTB neurons in other species.
These results indicate that our cultured neurons have some electrophysiological properties in common with SCN neurons in brain slices and in vivo.
Hence, our findings imply that neurons with larger dendritic arbors have improved encoding capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI
50 Citations
The alternative theory asserts that each memory is distributed across many millions of neurons.
The results also are determined by the responses of many neurons rather than the sensitivity of individual cells.

See what other people are reading

Does sleep quality affect gene expression in a pregnant woman?
5 answers
What is the conclusion on longitudinal studies of hypothalamus and ptsd?
5 answers
What is the relationship between chronic stress, cortisol, and cognitive function in humans?
5 answers
What is the relationship between chronic stress, cortisol, and cognitive function in humans?
5 answers
How does bleaching affect keratins conformation?
4 answers
What does immunohistochemistry staining of IP3R reveals in AD brain tissue?
5 answers
Immunohistochemistry staining of IP3R in Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain tissue reveals a reduction in the expression of Receptor-Associated Protein (RAP) compared to control brains. Additionally, the presence of beta-amyloid in AD brains, a characteristic feature of the disease, shows the distribution of p3, a derivative of beta-amyloid, in selected areas of AD brain, particularly in dystrophic neurites associated with plaques. Furthermore, the study of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) in AD brains indicates an upregulation of PI3K in oligodendrocytes and neurons, possibly in response to apoptotic signals, suggesting a role in the regulation of apoptosis in AD pathology. These findings collectively highlight the intricate molecular changes associated with AD pathophysiology revealed through immunohistochemical staining techniques.
What evidence is there for Greater Male Variability?
5 answers
Evidence for Greater Male Variability (GMV) is supported by various studies across different species. Studies on non-human animals like rhesus macaques have shown that males exhibit more variability in traits like brain size, potentially due to selection pressures on male behavior or sex chromosome effects. Additionally, research on hearing thresholds in humans has consistently demonstrated greater variability across males compared to females, along with higher correlations between related measures within males, supporting a link between GMV and the mosaic pattern of X-chromosome activation in females. Furthermore, meta-analyses on personality traits in mammals, birds, and reptiles/amphibians have indicated that sex differences in variability align with previous findings, suggesting that the greater male variability hypothesis remains plausible despite some non-significant results.
What evidence is there for Greater Male Variability in humans?
5 answers
Evidence for Greater Male Variability in humans is supported by studies on personality traits and brain size. Research on non-human animals suggests that males exhibit greater variability in personality traits like boldness, aggression, activity, sociality, and exploration, aligning with the Greater Male Variability (GMV) hypothesis. Additionally, studies on brain size variability in non-human primates, specifically rhesus macaques, indicate that males have more variable endocranial volumes, potentially due to sex chromosome effects or selection on male behavior. These findings imply that GMV extends beyond morphological traits to include behavioral and neurological characteristics, providing insights into sex differences in variability among humans.
How do social environments affect peoples behaviours?
5 answers
Social environments play a crucial role in shaping people's behaviors. The social environment of an individual consists of socio-structural, referential, and interactive components, influencing their involvement in criminal activities and attitudes towards deviant behavior. Additionally, social settings impact behavioral responses to substances like alcohol, where being in a socially-enriched environment can amplify euphoric effects induced by alcohol consumption. Furthermore, sick animals exhibit changes in behavior that can be modulated by social interactions, affecting neural molecular responses to sickness in species like the zebra finch. Human behavior is deeply influenced by the environment, with behaviors being rooted in experience, culture, and the dynamics of behavior settings. Understanding the reciprocal interaction between individuals and their environment is crucial for comprehending how social environments influence behaviors at both individual and collective levels.
What is the relationship between lentiform nucleus morphometry and functional outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease?
5 answers
Lentiform nucleus morphometry plays a crucial role in predicting functional outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS). Studies have shown that atrophy of the lentiform nucleus, along with other brain regions like the motor cortex, thalamus, and hippocampus, is associated with poorer motor and non-motor outcomes post-DBS. Changes in lentiform nucleus morphology can impact various aspects of PD, including locomotion impairments like freezing of gait. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses have revealed reduced brain volume in limbic and neocortical areas in PD patients, emphasizing the importance of understanding brain structural changes for predicting cognitive and social cognitive functions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the potential of lentiform nucleus morphometry in larger patient cohorts for more accurate outcome predictions.
How does regular physical activity impact function of the brain?
5 answers
Regular physical activity has a significant impact on brain function. It leads to various beneficial effects such as increased network connectivity, efficiency, and stability in resting-state networks, supporting cognitive functions. Physical activity induces structural and functional changes in the brain, promoting neurogenesis, cognition, and reducing symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, regular exercise positively influences intellectual and mental development by improving memory, concentration, reaction time, and reducing the risk of anxiety, depression, and stress. Furthermore, in individuals with type 2 diabetes, regular physical activity is associated with larger gray matter volumes in cortical and subcortical regions, independently of glycemic control, potentially mitigating the negative impact of diabetes on the brain. Overall, engaging in regular physical activity is crucial for enhancing brain plasticity, cognitive function, and overall brain health.