scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How to use audacity to remove noise from video? 

Answers from top 8 papers

More filters
Papers (8)Insight
With the help of computer simulation we show that the proposed algorithm is able to well remove impulse noise in color video.
The proposed method, in spite of its simplicity, is able to remove noise effectively for spectral bands with both low and high signal-to-noise ratio.
Open accessProceedings ArticleDOI
05 Dec 2008
50 Citations
The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can remove noise automatically and effectively.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Zhixun Su, Hui Wang, Junjie Cao 
26 Jun 2009
29 Citations
The presented method is simple, stable and able to effectively remove large noise.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
14 Mar 2010
26 Citations
Film grain noise is clearly noticeable in high-definition video, and should be preserved for the sake of natural look.
The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can remove noise automatically and effectively while edges and texture characteristics are preserved.
Therefore, it is possible to successfully identify and remove the remaining noise.
Experimental results show that the proposed method can excellently remove impulse noise, providing clear performance improvements over other state-of-the-art denoising methods.

See what other people are reading

What is the current state of the art for REaltimeQA? Do any use DSPy?
5 answers
What is the current state of the art for REaltimeQA? Do any use DSPy?
5 answers
What are the main applications of image denoising in scientific imaging?
5 answers
What are the main open questions regarding unsupervised deep learning approaches in denoising in scientific imaging?
5 answers
What are the main applications of image denoising in scientific imaging?
5 answers
What are the criteria for identifying and preserving cultural heritage sites?
5 answers
What is the best way to plot two quaternion?
5 answers
The most effective approach to plotting two quaternions involves utilizing quaternion maps to represent global spatial relationships among residues within proteins, as proposed in the research by Hanson and Thakur. Additionally, the use of quaternion principles can aid in extracting features from color images while reducing feature dimensions, as demonstrated in the work by Xiao and Zhou. Furthermore, the establishment of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for the quaternion linear canonical transform (QLCT) and its windowed version (QWLCT) can provide valuable insights into the localization and uncertainty aspects of quaternion-valued functions, as discussed in the studies by Bahri and Ashinoand Gao and Li. By integrating these diverse perspectives, a comprehensive and insightful visualization of two quaternions can be achieved, considering both spatial relationships and uncertainty principles.
What are the important variables to be considered when obtaining satellite images?
5 answers
When obtaining satellite images, important variables to consider include biophysical variables for various applications like agriculture, environment management, and climate studies. Factors affecting image quality are noise, which can be caused by environmental conditions, instrument accuracy, and data quantization, and can be mitigated through image restoration techniques like median, arithmetic mean, and geometric mean filters. Additionally, the image quality of very high-resolution satellite telescopes is influenced by optics, detector quality, pointing accuracy errors, attitude stability errors, altitude variations, and the use of charge-coupled devices with time delay and integration features. Furthermore, factors like illumination angle, Sun-Earth distance, environmental conditions, and weather effects must be considered during image rectification and registration processes for accurate interpretation and information extraction from satellite images.
Does gabor filter enhance accuracy in deep learning?
5 answers
Yes, Gabor filters enhance accuracy in deep learning across various applications. Research has shown that integrating Gabor filters with deep learning models improves accuracy significantly. For instance, in face recognition systems, a hybrid approach combining Gabor filters and deep neural networks led to a substantial increase in recognition accuracy for grayscale images from different databases. Similarly, in deepfake detection, utilizing Gabor filters to capture fine texture details of input data frames before feeding them to a CNN classifier resulted in higher efficiency in discriminating real from fake facial images. Moreover, in lung cancer diagnosis, applying Gabor filters with different orientation values to pre-process images before training deep learning models significantly increased accuracy rates, enabling faster and more accurate disease detection. These findings collectively demonstrate the effectiveness of Gabor filters in enhancing accuracy within deep learning frameworks.
Does reducing the depth of sequencing in a sample lead to a decrease in noise in application analysis?
4 answers
Reducing the depth of sequencing in a sample can indeed lead to a decrease in noise in application analysis. Lower-depth sequencing allows for larger sample sizes but at the cost of reduced accuracy. Methods like noisyR have been developed to filter out technical noise in sequencing data, enhancing the consistency of biological signals and improving downstream analyses. By minimizing noise, these filters help in achieving optimal information consistency across replicates and samples, facilitating more accurate pattern recognition and convergence of predictions in various sequencing assays, including coding and non-coding RNAs at both bulk and single-cell levels. Therefore, reducing sequencing depth and implementing noise reduction techniques can significantly improve the quality and reliability of application analyses.
What causes noise in seismic data?
5 answers
Noise in seismic data can stem from various sources. Weather-related mechanisms, like hydrostatic-pressure fluctuations caused by wave motion and dynamic fluctuations from turbulent boundary layers, contribute to noise during marine seismic acquisition. Additionally, seismic data can be affected by random noise generated by natural sources such as wind friction, tree vibrations, and cultural sources like traffic and human activities. During seismic data acquisition, unwanted waves, termed noise, are inevitable, impacting the quality of seismic records. The noise can manifest as ground rolls, multiples, and random oscillations, affecting the signal-to-noise ratio across time and frequency domains. Understanding and mitigating these diverse noise sources are crucial to enhancing the quality and interpretability of seismic data.