Is using cameras by governments low cost?
Best insight from top research papers
Using cameras for various applications, such as fever screening, laser detection, renewable energy monitoring, smart farming, and bridge deflection analysis, has been shown to be low cost in different contexts. For instance, a study on fever screening systems combined a low-cost thermal camera with a standard RGB camera for cost-effective screening . Similarly, a method for detecting continuous-wave lasers using a low-cost camera-based detector was developed, costing approximately £600 . Additionally, the use of low-cost cameras for thermography in PV solar systems demonstrated errors below 10% in costs and less than 0.015 USD/pixel . Furthermore, in Smart Farming applications, the impact of using low-cost cameras on the edge for pest detection was evaluated, showing that lower-resolution images can be used without significantly decreasing model performance, making the use of low-cost cameras feasible .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Yes, using low-cost camera-based methods for continuous-wave laser detection, as discussed in the paper, offers a cost-effective solution for governments to detect laser incidents accurately. | |
03 Aug 2021 | Yes, the paper introduces a low-cost thermal camera system for fever screening, which can be beneficial for governments to control the spread of viruses in crowded areas effectively. |
01 Jan 2023 | Not addressed in the paper. |
07 Oct 2019 5 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
How CCTV cameras reduce freedom in public spaces?5 answersCCTV cameras reduce freedom in public spaces by subjecting individuals to constant surveillance. The widespread deployment of CCTV technology for crime prevention and security purposes has led to concerns regarding privacy infringement and loss of control over personal data. While some argue that CCTV enhances safety, it also collects vast amounts of data on individuals, impacting their sense of liberty and security. Studies suggest that the presence of CCTV cameras may not significantly deter crime to justify their cost, but they do aid in investigations and case clearances. Additionally, the use of surveillance cameras can weaken public spaces by controlling social subjects and threatening citizens' freedom, as observed in case studies like the Vila Velha surveillance system.
Does CCTV cameras reduce freedom in public spaces?5 answersCCTV cameras have become ubiquitous in public spaces, raising concerns about the impact on freedom. Studies like those in Glasgowand Ottawahighlight the controversial nature of CCTV surveillance. The growth of surveillance cameras globallyand their presence in cities like Vila Velha, Braziland South Africaunderscores the debate. While CCTV is often justified for crime prevention, it can lead to a sense of being constantly monitored, potentially limiting freedom in public areas. The use of CCTV challenges the balance between safety and privacy, with implications for civil liberties. The technology's effectiveness in reducing crime is also questioned due to methodological challenges in measuring its impact. Overall, the proliferation of CCTV cameras in public spaces raises significant theoretical and practical concerns regarding individual freedoms.
2. How much do body-worn cameras help Philippine law enforcement forces be more transparent and accountable?5 answersBody-worn cameras (BWCs) have been shown to enhance police transparency and accountability. Research indicates that BWCs can lead to a reduction in complaints and use of force incidents, aiding in criminal and internal investigations. Despite concerns about the financial implications of BWCs, studies suggest that the benefits outweigh the costs, with a benefit-cost ratio estimated at 4.95. While police officers may express skepticism about the public value of BWCs, citizens generally endorse their use. However, public support for BWCs may decrease if citizens perceive that funding BWCs could result in cutbacks to social programs. Therefore, the implementation of BWCs in Philippine law enforcement could significantly improve transparency and accountability, benefiting both the police force and the community.
Is using cameras by governments in public space low cost?5 answersUsing cameras by governments in public spaces can be considered low cost. The implementation of video surveillance systems in public areas plays a crucial role in enhancing safety and security. With advancements in technology, the development of wide area surveillance systems has become feasible, allowing for ubiquitous monitoring at a relatively low cost. Additionally, the transition to smart city concepts has facilitated the deployment of cost-effective surveillance solutions that offer real-time monitoring and rapid intervention capabilities. While the initial cost of setting up surveillance systems may be a consideration, the long-term benefits in terms of safety and security justify the investment. Therefore, utilizing cameras in public spaces for governmental surveillance purposes can be seen as a cost-effective measure to ensure public safety and security.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of body-worn cameras for police officers?5 answersBody-worn cameras (BWCs) for police officers have both benefits and drawbacks. The benefits include the potential to reduce police misconduct and aggressive interactions with civilians. BWCs can also increase transparency and accountability in policing, as they provide video footage of police-public interactions. Additionally, BWCs have been found to be associated with a reduction in use-of-force complaints and officer reports of striking civilians. However, there are also drawbacks to BWCs. The presence of cameras may lead to de-policing, where officers choose to reduce the quality and quantity of their self-initiated police work. Furthermore, the use of BWC footage in the report writing process raises concerns about officer behavior and the potential for biased documentation of interactions. Police managers should carefully consider the implementation of BWCs, taking into account these benefits and drawbacks.
Is there any state of art of counting vehicles using cameras and what is the needed infraestructure?5 answersState-of-the-art methods for counting vehicles using cameras have been developed. These methods utilize multiple visual sources, such as smart cameras mounted on roads and highways, to monitor and count vehicles in real-time. The use of deep learning-based detectors and image processing techniques allows for accurate vehicle detection and counting. The infrastructure required for these systems includes static cameras mounted at strategic locations, capable of capturing video footage of the traffic flow. The cameras should be able to provide clear and high-resolution images, even in different lighting and weather conditions. Additionally, the system may require on-device processing capabilities to analyze the captured images and perform vehicle counting directly on the edge devices. Overall, these methods offer a promising solution for traffic surveillance and management, providing accurate vehicle counts for intelligent transportation systems.