What are the key findings of Gill's 2021 research on [insert topic here]?
Best insight from top research papers
Gill's 2021 research found that the bionic shark gill jet can reduce friction on the shark's surface, resulting in drag reduction of up to 17.15% . The study established a model of bionic jet surface based on shark surface analysis and conducted numerical simulations using the RNG k-e turbulence model. The results showed that the gill jet reduced frictional resistance on the shark's surface, with the best drag reduction achieved at a speed of 5m/s . The pressure of the jet hole upstream was reduced, leading to a decrease in pressure resistance on the jet surface . Additionally, the jet fluid was blocked in the boundary layer by the mainstream fluid, resulting in a reduction in the normal velocity gradient of the wall and achieving drag reduction .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
5 Citations | The provided paper is about the relationship between ADHD and depression, specifically examining whether social skills mediate this relationship. There is no mention of Gill's 2021 research in the paper. |
1 Citations | The provided paper is not about Gill's 2021 research. |
| The key findings of Gill's 2021 research are that blended group interventions, combining online and face-to-face sessions, are feasible and acceptable for adolescent females with social communication difficulties. The interventions led to significant improvements in social knowledge and social initiations. | |
| The provided paper is not by Gill, so there are no findings from Gill's 2021 research on any topic in this paper. The paper is about the development of social skills of high school students on virtual platforms. | |
| The provided paper is titled "A proposed teaching program for the development of social skills by kindergarten children" and does not mention any research conducted by Gill in 2021. |
Related Questions
What are the main findings of the study conducted by Meena et al. in 2021?5 answersMeena et al. conducted a varietal study on introduced technical grapevine varieties in 2021. The study evaluated 26 grapevine varieties, highlighting agrobiological indicators, yields, and crop conditions. Key findings include varying blooming eye percentages among white and red berry varieties, with notable average bunch weights for specific varieties. Varieties like Kharko, Tashkentsky, Gabekhauri shavi, and Marguli sapère exhibited high estimated yields. Moreover, certain varieties stood out for their sugar content, with Biyas Aibatly and Aleksandrouli showcasing high sugar levels. Overall, the study identified top-performing grapevine varieties for 2021, such as Kharko, Khikhvi, Mkhardgzeli, and Kokur belyj for white technical varieties, and Aleksandrouli, Gabekhauri Shavi, Marguli Sapere, Saperavi Dediani, and Sangiovese for red technical varieties.
What are the key findings of the study published at <https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-0818>?5 answersThe key findings of the study published at <https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-0818> are related to board certification in physical medicine and rehabilitation. The study summarizes key findings from peer-reviewed studies conducted by the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation staff and leadership over the past 6 years. The findings indicate that the board certification process in this field is reliable, statistically valid, and predictive of the risk of disciplinary action in subsequent years. The studies also provide insights into various aspects of the specialty, including the degree of subspecialization, burnout, and how people maintain certification over time. These findings are important for physical medicine and rehabilitation trainees, diplomates, institutions, programs, and other stakeholders in the field.
What are the key findings of V. Kokila's research in 2020?5 answersThe key findings of V. Kokila's research in 2020 are not mentioned in the provided abstracts.
What are the key findings of the study conducted by Granot et al. (2021)?5 answersThe study conducted by Granot et al. (2021) found that the research on the adoption of e-learning has grown exponentially since 2010. Taiwan was identified as the most contributing country in the e-learning adoption literature, with National Central University being the contributing institution. The keyword co-occurrence analysis revealed that mobile learning, blended learning, higher education, TAM, UTAUT, and structural equation model were prominent in e-learning adoption studies. Recent trends in the field included topics such as covid-19, mobile technologies, flipped classrooms, social media, MOOC, PLS-SEM, and UTAUT-2. The findings of the study provide a comprehensive description of the field and offer valuable insights for future researchers interested in e-learning adoption.
What are the main findings of the Rangwala 2021 articles?4 answersThe main findings of the Rangwala 2021 articles are as follows: (1) Neonatal vitamin A supplementation (NVAS) reduces infant mortality in South Asia in contexts with high prevalence of maternal vitamin A deficiency and rates of early infant mortality, but not in contexts with low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency and lower rates of infant mortality. (2) The weak oscillating magnetic field caused by the inductive coupling between the transverse magnetization of nuclei and the radio frequency circuit perturbs remote resonances when homonuclear total correlation mixing is applied. (3) The implementation of alternative bedrock configurations in land surface models (LSMs) improves the simulation of seasonal transpiration patterns, particularly in sites with extended dry seasons and shallow bedrock. (4) A review of research on children with COVID-19 in 2021 found that approximately 27.81% of pediatric patients had normal chest CT scans and chest X-ray images, ground glass opacity was the most frequently detected parenchymal lesion, and lung CT scan findings in children were less severe than in adults.
What are some of the key findings from N.P. Sukhanova's 2022 paper?5 answersN.P. Sukhanova's 2022 paper does not appear to be included in the provided abstracts.