What are the most commonly used data collection methods in systematic reviews?
Best insight from top research papers
The most commonly used data collection methods in systematic reviews include extracting data directly from journal articles, utilizing structured data collection forms, exploring English and non-English language databases, incorporating study registries in search strategies, and using standardized extraction forms and automation tools like Covidence. Data sources such as Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science are frequently utilized. Additionally, non-traditional methods like digital and social media platforms such as Facebook, ResearchGate, WhatsApp, Viber, LinkedIn, and the Global Health Data Exchange are increasingly employed to obtain unreported data from authors of primary studies eligible for systematic reviews. Electronic data capture methods are also utilized to collect pain-related data in clinical and research settings, showing equivalence to conventional methods in terms of score accuracy, completeness, ease of use, efficiency, and acceptability.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
16 Citations | Electronic data capture and conventional methods like paper-and-pencil, telephone, or in-person are commonly used for pain-related data collection in systematic reviews. |
| The most commonly used data collection methods in systematic reviews include traditional methods like email/telephone and digital/social media platforms such as Facebook, ResearchGate, WhatsApp, Viber, LinkedIn, and GHDx. | |
| Structured data collection forms, including paper, electronic, or online systems, are commonly used methods for collecting data in systematic reviews of test accuracy. | |
1 Citations | The most commonly used data collection methods in systematic reviews include Medline (98%), Embase (65%), Cochrane Library (56%), and Web of Science (33%). |
Related Questions
What are the different methods used for data collection?5 answersData collection methods encompass a variety of techniques utilized in research. These methods include creative approaches like online surveys, smartphones, enhanced interviews, diaries, visual data, mapping, and case studies. Research instruments play a crucial role in collecting and processing data, with qualitative research relying on human instruments and quantitative research utilizing test instruments and inventories. Sampling and data collection techniques in mixed methods research involve various sampling schemes such as convenience, probability, purposive, and mixed methods sampling, along with different data collection techniques based on the number of samples and time points. Ethical considerations are essential before data collection, which can involve archival sources, passive or active methods, mobile apps, and crowdsourcing, with a focus on minimizing harmful impacts. Conventional methods for primary data collection include quantitative approaches like counting, measuring, and questionnaires, as well as qualitative methods such as interviews, focus groups, documents, and observation.
What is the systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a method used to search, select, appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that fit pre-specified criteria to answer a research question. It plays a crucial role in evidence-based research by evaluating and synthesizing existing literature, identifying patterns across multiple studies, and addressing complex questions. Systematic reviews are transparent, reproducible, and credible, and they contribute to the current understanding of complex issues, inform clinical practice and policy, and impact medical practices and policies. In healthcare, systematic reviews are used to address therapeutic research questions and assess the level of evidence for specific interventions. In other fields such as land planning and environmental management, systematic reviews are used to study the methods used in prospective studies and scenario-based approaches, and to assess soil ecosystem services and related threats. Additionally, systematic reviews are used to measure and assess abortion stigma, and to develop tools and methods for valid and reliable measurement.
What methodology is adopted for systematic literature Review?5 answersA systematic literature review is a thorough summary of prior research in a specific topic, and the methodology adopted for conducting such reviews varies across disciplines. In the field of management sciences, the methodology for systematic literature reviews focuses on providing a comprehensive overview of relevant literature, synthesizing earlier work, and adhering to principles of accessibility and bias reduction. In the response surface methodology (RSM), which is used for process and design optimization, recent studies have proposed modifications to incorporate observational data, including modifications to the design of the experiment, response modeling, and optimization techniques. In engineering sciences, a tool-supported and task-oriented engineering flow methodology has been proposed to standardize the execution of systematic literature reviews, based on the PRISMA methodology from medical sciences. A protocol has been developed for conducting a systematic literature review on state-of-the-art models for developing strategies in professional administrations, with emphasis on hospitals and schools. In the social sciences, the stages of conducting a systematic literature review have been adjusted to suit the particularities of the field, including formulation of research questions, protocol development, literature search, screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis.
What is the latest systematic literature review method?5 answersThe latest systematic literature review method is the systematic iterative multilayer literature review (SIMILAR) method developed by Kosztyán et al.. This method allows researchers to refine the initial classification rules of selected papers through iterations, integrate multilayer network theory into the literature review process, and conduct longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses simultaneously. The SIMILAR method fills the gap in current literature review methods by providing a comprehensive approach that models the structure and evolution of a research field. It offers the ability to iteratively refine extracted categories and incorporates powerful multilayer network theory. The added value of the SIMILAR method has been demonstrated through its application in the field of information systems..
How to conduct a systematic literature review?3 answersA systematic literature review in computer science research can be conducted by following clearly defined strategies and an algorithmic method. For conducting a systematic literature review on IoT metrics, a study used a set of research questions to inventory and classify recent studies, resulting in the identification of 158 metrics categorized into 12 categories. To conduct a systematic review on pocket parks, a study employed bibliometric methods and critical review to analyze and review 276 papers, providing insights into influencing factors, design methods, and benefits of pocket parks. In the study of digital democracy, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Scopus database, revealing dominant concepts and impacts of the digital era on democracy. To analyze and synthesize the knowledge on dialogic pedagogy within school settings, a systematic quantitative literature review was conducted, identifying gaps in the literature and suggesting new avenues for research.
How do you write a systematic review methodology?2 answers