What are the perspective of of public on theraputic cloning?
Best insight from top research papers
Public attitudes towards therapeutic cloning are generally more positive compared to reproductive cloning. In quantitative research, therapeutic cloning was generally accepted, especially when the benefits of the procedure were clear . However, participants in focus groups initially saw cloning as reproductive cloning and did not see any real benefits until the issue of therapeutic cloning was explicitly raised . Overall, therapeutic cloning was viewed more favorably than reproductive cloning in all the analyses conducted . These findings suggest that the public is more accepting of therapeutic cloning when they understand the potential benefits it can offer .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
Papers (4) | Insight |
---|---|
56 Citations | The perspective of the public on therapeutic cloning is not mentioned in the provided information. |
The research shows that the public generally views therapeutic cloning more favorably than reproductive cloning. | |
14 Dec 2012 | The perspective of the public on therapeutic cloning is influenced by misconceptions and uninformed opinions, which can hinder the development of clear international guidelines on the permissibility of embryonic stem cell research and human cloning. |
The given text does not provide any information about the perspectives of the public on therapeutic cloning. |
Related Questions
What are the current developement of theraputic cloning??5 answersTherapeutic cloning has made significant advancements in recent years, particularly in the combination of cloning with transgenic technologies. The technology now exists to enable therapeutic cloning for human therapy, but there are constraints that currently limit or prevent its application. Cloning valuable research animals can help alleviate limited availability of genotypes and reduce the number of animals used for research. Cloning and transgenics can also be used to produce phenotypes in large animals for studying diseases that are inadequate in rodent models, such as cystic fibrosis. Additionally, cloned parent stock in the cattle and hog industries can improve profits and produce a more uniform product. Understanding the potential benefits and limitations of therapeutic cloning will facilitate its implementation in medicine and agriculture.
Reports on therapeutic cloning ?4 answersTherapeutic cloning, also known as nuclear transfer technology, has been the subject of numerous articles and discussions. However, the research literature on therapeutic cloning is limited, with only four articles published on the topic, all in the mouse. These articles have shown consistent efficiency in deriving embryonic stem cell lines through nuclear transfer, but the current efficiency is too low for widespread clinical use. Despite this limitation, there are high expectations for therapeutic cloning in rejuvenating the aging or diseased body. Legislation on therapeutic cloning varies in different countries, and there are ethical concerns associated with the practice, such as the potential for producing identical human beings in the lab. Leading authorities in the United Kingdom have recommended considering changing legislation to allow the cloning of human cells for therapeutic research, while maintaining a ban on cloning for reproductive purposes.
What are the different stakeholders that are affected by human therapeutic cloning?1 answersDifferent stakeholders that are affected by human therapeutic cloning include institutional stakeholders, teachers, students, parents, the European Union, the European Commission, the European parliament, the medical and scientific community, genetic parents, and legislators in different countries. These stakeholders have varying interests, perceptions, and preoccupations regarding therapeutic cloning. Institutional stakeholders in India, for example, are working to support women and girls in science. The European Union is sending contradictory messages to the medical and scientific community, with the European Commission calling for a rational debate while the European parliament believes that all research in this area should be banned. Concerns for reproductive liberty suggest that decisions about embryos should be made by the genetic parents, which implies that therapeutic cloning would be unethical without their consent. Legislators in different countries have implemented legislation on therapeutic cloning. Overall, these stakeholders play a significant role in shaping the discourse and policies surrounding human therapeutic cloning.
What are the ethical beneficnec of theraputic cloning in humans?2 answersTherapeutic cloning in humans has several ethical benefits. It can help in the research field and medical sciences, providing advancements in stem cell culture and potential therapeutic benefits. Additionally, it can solve health problems such as organ transplantation and organ rejection issues. The medical and scientific benefits of therapeutic cloning are so great that it is argued to be morally required. However, it is important to note that there are real and substantial ethical concerns surrounding cloning, including the risks and dangers associated with it. Therefore, any potential use of therapeutic cloning should be done in a research context with careful monitoring and follow-up of children and families. Despite these concerns, some countries have legalized therapeutic cloning, recognizing its potential benefits.
What are law issues related to theraputic cloning in humans?2 answersLaw issues related to therapeutic cloning in humans include the need for legal regulation, the establishment of penalties for violations, and the protection of both clone-donors and cloned individuals. The lack of legal regulation in the Russian Federation has been identified as a concern. Extensive regulation is deemed necessary to ensure the safety and well-being of all parties involved. Additionally, the legal status of the cultured or unimplanted embryo and the consideration of cloning as an aspect of reproductive liberty are important legal questions. The potential benefits and harms of therapeutic cloning, as well as concerns about who will benefit and at what cost to others, should inform public policy. The ethical and legal challenges surrounding human cloning have led to recommendations for a moratorium on its practice.
What are the both positive and negative implications of theraputic cloning of humans legally?1 answersTherapeutic cloning of humans has both positive and negative implications legally. On the positive side, therapeutic cloning has the potential to revolutionize medical and therapeutic techniques, leading to significant advancements in health development. It holds promise for treating various diseases and conditions by creating personalized stem cells for regenerative medicine. However, there are also negative implications to consider. The ethical and moral concerns surrounding reproductive cloning are significant. Cloning technology has the potential for reproductive cloning, which raises serious ethical and legal issues. The psychological implications associated with family structure and relationships, such as autonomy and unfair expectations, are also a concern. Therefore, while therapeutic cloning offers potential benefits, it is crucial to carefully consider the legal and ethical implications before proceeding.