How has idiographic research evolved over time?3 answersIdiographic research has evolved over time, expanding from ethnography to include grounded theory, phenomenology, focus groups, semi-structured interviews, digital methods, and mixed and multiple methods that incorporate qualitative inquiry. There has been a shift from using perspectives of strangers to centering on the use of self as data, as seen in autoethnography, and involving participants as equal partners in research, as in community-based participatory research. Idiographic research has also seen advancements in the use of new time-series techniques to address individual differences, but caution is needed in interpreting heterogeneity due to sampling variation and power limitations. The relationship between idiographic research and the nomothetic mainstream has become more harmonious, with unique manifestation research and intraindividual research forming an essential part of psychology in the 21st century. Overall, idiographic research has evolved to encompass a range of methods and approaches, highlighting the importance of understanding individual experiences and differences in psychological research.
What are some of the key contributions of idiographic research?5 answersIdiographic research has several key contributions. It allows for the investigation of individual-level psychological processes, which cannot be fully captured by group-based research designs. Idiographic research can identify causal processes that do not fit existing academic theories and document implicit causal theories in social action. It also helps in resolving the therapist's dilemma by providing information gathered through individual-level research for treating individuals. Idiographic research has been proposed as a promising avenue for future research, highlighting evidence for radical heterogeneity. However, caution is needed in interpreting the results of idiographic research due to classic statistical problems and power limitations. Overall, idiographic research enriches causal inquiry, expands the causal vocabulary of social work research, and brings depth and nuance to causal theories.
How is the idiographic approach different from the nomothetic approach in psychology?3 answersThe idiographic approach in psychology focuses on individual-level analyses, while the nomothetic approach focuses on group-level analyses. The idiographic approach emphasizes the study of particulars and the unique characteristics of individuals, whereas the nomothetic approach seeks to identify general patterns and principles that apply to a group of individuals. In contemporary clinical and personality research, there has been a resurgence of interest in idiographic approaches, which consider the historical and contextual nature of research and reframe construct development and structural taxonomies as idiographic pursuits. Empirical studies comparing idiographic and nomothetic methods have been conducted with measures such as the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, but no clear superiority of one approach over the other has been consistently demonstrated. Further research is needed to explore the impact of procedural variables and the ability of idiographic and nomothetic approaches to predict other behaviors of interest.
Why is the psychodynamic approach beneficial in psychology?5 answersThe psychodynamic approach is beneficial in psychology because it offers a deeper understanding of clinical difficulties and aids in the treatment of mental disorders. Psychodynamic concepts can be used by behavior therapists to address commonly encountered challenges in a behavioral context. Additionally, psychodynamic therapy has traditionally been used to treat nonpsychotic disorders, mental disorders in stable condition, and underlying personality disturbances. This approach allows for a more human and empathically engaged therapist, which can enhance the therapeutic process. The psychodynamic approach also provides a historical perspective and a comprehensive understanding of the nature of mental illness. Overall, the psychodynamic approach complements other therapeutic strategies and contributes to a holistic understanding of psychological phenomena and effective treatment interventions.
What is Psychodynamic in Psychology?2 answersPsychodynamic in psychology refers to the study of mental forces and motivations that influence human behavior and mental activity. It emphasizes the role of unconscious motivation in the causation of human behavior. Psychodynamic considerations are particularly relevant in the clinical approach to brain disease in the elderly, as psychodynamic factors play a significant role in these disorders. Psychodynamic concepts have been used in group analysis, where they have been found to be advantageous, although the operative processes differ from those observed in individual psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis, with its emphasis on the psychogenesis of illness, has laid the groundwork for understanding group analysis as a powerful therapy, a stimulating theory, and a source of information and discovery in the psychosocial field. Despite the difficulties in linking psychoanalysis with scientific psychology, psychoanalytic theory continues to inspire observations and hypotheses in contemporary scientific psychology.
What are the types of research approach?2 answersThere are different types of research approaches. These include qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research. The research approach chosen depends on various factors such as the research topic, data type, logic (inductive or deductive), timeframe, research design, and triangulation. Research outputs can vary from descriptions of reality to constructs, models, methods, instantiations, and proofs. The choice of research approach can have implications for the value and application of research results in both science and practice. In the study of the IBPYP curriculum policy process in remote international schools in Indonesia, a qualitative research design was used. The aim was to address the gap between policy and practice and explore the interconnectivity of curriculum policy processes, internationalization, and remote contexts. In the study on individual belief formation towards the use of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems, a quantitative research design was used to develop concepts for a questionnaire.