What is condign power and give relevant examples of condign power?
Best insight from top research papers
Condign power refers to the ability to coerce or influence others through means such as financial sanctions, support for nonviolent opposition, and offensive cyber operations . In the context of markets, condign power can manifest through cartels, where buyers or sellers form coalitions to limit market participation and set equilibrium quantities, ensuring compliance through incentives and stability . Additionally, the European Union has demonstrated normative power in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by shaping discourse, invoking norms, and setting examples, influencing the conflict dynamics significantly . These examples illustrate different facets of condign power across various domains, showcasing its diverse applications and implications in international relations, economics, and conflict resolution.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Condign power refers to using power based on distance for wireless capacity improvement. Examples include distributed scheduling, connectivity, spectrum auctions, and packet scheduling in wireless networks. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Condign power refers to power that is appropriate or fitting. Examples include returning library books and annoying neighbors with loud music, as discussed in the paper. | |
Open access•Book 25 Feb 2016 | Not addressed in the paper. |
| Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What is the relationship between servant leadership and coercive power?10 answersThe relationship between servant leadership and coercive power is nuanced, reflecting a fundamental divergence in leadership approaches. Servant leadership, as conceptualized by Robert Greenleaf and further explored in various studies, emphasizes the importance of serving others and prioritizing the needs of the community or organization over individual ambitions. This leadership style is characterized by a commitment to others, the development of personal and collective strengths, and the ability to lead through persuasion rather than coercion. It systematically places the needs of servants ahead of the leaders, fostering an environment of responsibility, respect, care, and collaboration, which contrasts sharply with the principles underlying coercive power.
Coercive power, derived from French and Raven's five bases of power, involves the ability of a leader to enforce obedience through the threat of punishment or the imposition of sanctions. A study focusing on gender dissimilar supervisor-employee dyads and employee locus of control found that while reward power positively correlates with employee effort, coercive power, especially when exhibited by female supervisors, also led to greater employee effort, suggesting that coercive power can have a motivating effect under certain circumstances. However, this form of power fundamentally conflicts with the servant leadership ethos, which advocates for leading by example, empowerment, and emotional support rather than through fear or compulsion.
Moreover, the principles of servant leadership align more closely with ethical leadership models, such as Islamic Leadership, which, despite recognizing the necessity of coerciveness under specific, limited circumstances, generally promotes justice, equity, and moderation, diverging from the coercive power's emphasis on control and obedience. The effectiveness of servant leadership in fostering organizational commitment and project success within various settings, including healthcare and NGOs, further underscores its positive impact, which is achieved without resorting to coercion.
In summary, while coercive power can be effective in certain contexts, servant leadership offers a more sustainable and ethical approach to leadership that seeks to empower and inspire rather than control, marking a clear departure from the principles of coercive power.
What is contibusion?4 answersContribution refers to the act of adding or providing something to a particular cause or project. It can involve various aspects such as providing specialized services in e-commerce based on customer behavior analysis, evaluating the degree of control over events in a program conditioning system, analyzing the impact of conatus on the perpetuity of family businesses, and developing scaling techniques for concolic execution in program analysis. Each of these papers contributes to their respective fields by offering insights, methodologies, and empirical evidence to advance knowledge and understanding.
What is corporate power-sharing or consociational model?5 answersCorporate power-sharing, also known as the consociational model, is a form of governance that aims to manage conflicts in divided societies by providing representation for previously excluded groups. It involves the sharing of power between different groups or segments of society based on criteria such as common ancestry, language, religion, or cultural background. The consociational model has been widely used as a peacebuilding tool in post-conflict settings, but there is a lack of consideration for its impact on women's representation. The consociational model has been explored in the context of post-conflict Syria, with the suggestion that a transitional consociational power-sharing arrangement followed by a centripetal-based power structure may be suitable for the country. However, the parameters of consociational power-sharing are limited to effective conflict management and do not extend to achieving significant identity transformation. The merits of consociational coalitions, based on sequential and proportional allocation rules, have been assessed in the case of Northern Ireland, highlighting their advantages in the government of deeply divided places.
Is concentration of power good?5 answersThe concentration of power involves a trade-off. On one hand, power-concentrating institutions allocate more power to the voters' preferred candidate. On the other hand, higher power concentration increases electoral stakes and induces stronger policy distortions. The optimal level of power concentration depends on the extent of office motivation and the conflict of interest between voters and politicians. Full concentration of power is desirable if politicians are mostly welfare oriented. Concerns about market power and competition in the agri-food sector are widespread, but the evidence does not support the claim that stronger actors systematically abuse their position at the expense of farmers. In summary, the effects of power concentration are complex and depend on various factors such as the motivation of politicians and the specific context in which it is applied.
Why coercive power is better than reward power?4 answersCoercive power is not necessarily better than reward power. The abstracts provide mixed findings on the effectiveness of coercive power compared to reward power. According to Molm, the use of coercive power in social exchange relations is constrained by the fear of loss and potential retaliation, making it risky. However, another study by Molm suggests that more frequent use of contingent punishment can increase the effectiveness of punishment power, especially when used consistently and strongly. On the other hand, the abstracts also highlight the positive influence of reward power on trust and motivation in organizations. Therefore, the effectiveness of coercive power versus reward power may depend on the specific context and the way in which they are used.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of conciliation as a dispute resolution method?5 answersConciliation as a dispute resolution method has distinct advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is that it allows the parties involved to find a solution that they both voluntarily accept, which can lead to a more satisfactory outcome. Additionally, conciliation emphasizes the importance of avoiding conflict and observing proper rules of behavior, which aligns with cultural values in certain contexts such as China. However, the main disadvantage of conciliation is that it relies on the success of the conciliator in facilitating an agreement, and if they are unable to do so, a binding decision by a third party may be necessary to resolve the dispute. This can lead to delays and additional costs. Some argue that a combination of conciliation and arbitration may be an ideal solution, while others believe that merging the two methods can render both ineffective.