scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Whats the prevalence of KRAS and BRAF comutation in metastatic colon cancer 


Best insight from top research papers

The prevalence of KRAS and BRAF comutation in metastatic colon cancer varies across different studies. A study in Iranian metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients found that KRAS mutations were present in 33.6% of cases, with no BRAF mutations detected . Another global review reported a median global prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients at 38%, with the KRAS G12C mutation specifically at 3.1% . Additionally, a study in South India found KRAS mutations in 18.75% of metastatic colorectal cancer cases analyzed . These findings highlight the variability in KRAS mutation rates in metastatic colon cancer, with BRAF mutations being less common or absent in some populations.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
Not addressed in the paper.
Not addressed in the paper.
KRAS mutations were found in 33.6% of metastatic colorectal cancer cases in Iran, while no BRAF mutations were detected, indicating a lack of comutation between KRAS and BRAF.
Not addressed in the paper.
Not addressed in the paper.

Related Questions

What is the percentage of patients moving to 2L and 3L in KRAS G12 mutated colorectal cancer?5 answersIn colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with KRAS G12 mutations, approximately 47% move to the second line (2L) of treatment, and around 35% progress to the third line (3L) of treatment. The prevalence of the KRAS G12C mutation in CRC is around 3.1%, with limited evidence suggesting a lower objective response rate and inferior disease-free/relapse-free survival in these patients compared to those with other KRAS mutations. Additionally, KRAS G12D mutation is relatively common in CRC, accounting for 30.8% of all KRAS mutations in CRC cases. The KRAS G12D mutation is associated with unique clinical and genomic characteristics, and it co-occurs with PIK3CA mutation in CRC cases.
What is the current understanding of the epidemiology of KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC)??5 answersThe epidemiology of KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) is significant due to its association with poor prognosis and resistance to EGFR targeted therapy. KRAS mutations, including G12C, are prevalent in CRC, with approximately 30% of all cancer cases and nearly 50% of metastatic CRC cases exhibiting KRAS mutations. Recent advancements have led to the development of allele-specific covalent inhibitors targeting KRAS G12C, such as Sotorasib and Adagrasib, which have shown promising efficacy in CRC treatment. The location of KRAS mutations, such as G12C, can impact survival outcomes in CRC patients, with specific mutation locations like G12S correlating with shorter overall survival times. Understanding the prevalence and implications of KRAS G12C mutations in CRC is crucial for guiding targeted treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.
What is the current understanding of the epidemiology of KRAS G12C-mutated CRC?5 answersThe global prevalence of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) is estimated at 38%, with the KRAS G12C mutation specifically found in 3.1% of patients with CRC, indicating its significance in the disease. Studies have shown that KRAS G12C mutations are more common in right-sided colon tumors and are associated with a lower objective response rate and inferior disease-free survival compared to other KRAS mutations. Furthermore, research in the Argentine population revealed a prevalence of 14.48% for KRAS G12C mutations, with significant associations observed between this mutation and advanced cancer stages and smoking history. In pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer, the prevalence of KRAS G12C mutations varies, with unique clinical and genomic characteristics identified in each cancer type. Additionally, in advanced PDAC patients with KRAS G12C mutations, treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GP) showed significantly longer median overall survival compared to FOLFIRINOX.
What are the current epidemiological trends in the incidence and prevalence of metastatic melanoma globally?5 answersMetastatic melanoma, a significant public health concern, exhibits varying epidemiological trends globally. The incidence of melanoma is on the rise, particularly in fair-skinned populations with excessive sun exposure. Mortality rates have been increasing in most regions, albeit at a slower pace than incidence, with a notable drop in the United States due to new treatments for stage 4 melanoma. Targeted therapies like BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immunotherapies have contributed to improved survival rates, especially in the US where mortality has decreased by almost 30% over the past decade. Despite advancements, challenges like resistance to treatments and limited efficacy in some patients persist, emphasizing the need for better biomarkers to enhance treatment selection and outcomes. These trends underscore the importance of continued research and interventions to address the evolving landscape of metastatic melanoma globally.
What is the prevalence of KRAS mutations in urothelial cancer?5 answersThe prevalence of KRAS mutations in urothelial cancer varies depending on the study. One study found that the frequency of RAS mutations, including KRAS, in bladder cancer patients was 11.2%. Another study focused specifically on urothelial carcinomas and found that KRAS mutations accounted for 28.6% of RAS mutations in bladder cancer patients. However, it is important to note that these studies had different sample sizes and methodologies, so the exact prevalence may vary.
What is importance of braf mutations in colon cancer?5 answersBRAF mutations in colon cancer are of significant importance. Patients with BRAF mutated colon cancer have poor survival outcomes and controversial treatment strategies. The tumor microenvironment in BRAF mutated colon cancer is different, with more stromal cells, immune cell infiltration, and lower tumor purity. Several immunotherapeutic targets, such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIM-3, are highly expressed in BRAF mutated patients. BRAF mutation is also associated with higher proportions of neutrophils and macrophages M1, and lower proportions of plasma cells, dendritic cells resting, and T cells CD4 naive. BRAF mutations are observed at high frequency in right-side colon cancer, especially in the cecum, and can be detected in plasma. BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer stratified for molecular background have prognostic and clinical significance. In stage IV CRC, BRAF mutations are an independent negative prognostic factor, but patients with BRAF mutations may have better prognoses if treated with chemotherapy prior to tumor resection.

See what other people are reading

What is the effect of catch up friday?
5 answers
Weekend catch-up sleep, where individuals extend their sleep duration on weekends to compensate for weekday sleep deficits, has shown various effects on health outcomes. Studies have indicated that weekend catch-up sleep is associated with a decreased risk of childhood overweight in school children, a lower body mass index in the general population, and poorer performance on attention tasks in adolescents. Additionally, weekend catch-up sleep has been linked to modifying the association between hypertension and all-cause mortality, suggesting its importance for individuals with hypertension. These findings highlight the potential benefits and consequences of engaging in catch-up sleep behaviors over the weekend, impacting various aspects of health and well-being.
Diference difference between Notch 1 and Notch 2 in NSC?
5 answers
NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 play distinct roles in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Research indicates that NOTCH1 inhibition leads to substantial cell death in NSCLC cells, while NOTCH2 deletion results in increased carcinogenesis and aggressive tumor growth. Moreover, high levels of active NOTCH1 can induce a shift from EGFR to NOTCH1 dependence, causing resistance to EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC. Additionally, NOTCH2NL, a novel gene involved in radiation resistance in NSCLC, impacts canonical Notch signaling, regulates MYC expression, and increases MYC pathway activity. Furthermore, Notch expression patterns vary in NSCLC subtypes, with adenocarcinoma showing higher NOTCH2 expression and squamous cell carcinoma exhibiting elevated NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 levels, influencing disease progression and recurrence. In summary, NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 have distinct functions in NSCLC, with implications for tumor behavior and treatment response.
Why does some heavy smokers don't get cancer?
5 answers
Some heavy smokers may not develop cancer due to individual variations in immune responses and genetic factors. Research shows that heavy smokers exhibit elevated levels of inflammatory markers and altered immune responses, which could impact their susceptibility to cancer. Additionally, the mutational landscape of lung cancer differs between smokers and never/light-smokers, with specific gene variants associated with different smoking statuses, influencing cancer development. Moreover, methylation patterns in specific genes like AHRR may play a role in identifying high-risk subpopulations for lung cancer screening among heavy smokers, indicating a potential link between epigenetic changes and cancer risk. Therefore, the interplay of immune responses, genetic mutations, and epigenetic modifications may contribute to the variability in cancer development among heavy smokers.
What was the cumulative dose(s) of lansoprazole that was associated with AKI and/or incident CKD?
5 answers
The study by Wu et al. identified significant signals between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Specifically, they found that dexlansoprazole had a stronger association with both AKI and CKD compared to other PPIs, with a reporting odds ratio (ROR) of 818 for AKI and 3494 for CKD. The median time from PPI use to AKI occurrence was 23 days, while for CKD, it was 177 days. This data highlights the potential risk of AKI and CKD associated with dexlansoprazole use, emphasizing the importance of monitoring patients on this specific PPI for kidney-related adverse events.
Does beta HPV pass by hand?
4 answers
Beta human papillomavirus (HPV) can be transmitted through hand-to-genital contact, as suggested by research. Studies have shown that hand-to-genital contact may play a role in HPV transmission. Furthermore, beta-HPVs, commonly found in human skin, can be transmitted through continuous person-to-person contact within families, indicating that HPV transmission often results from close contact between individuals. While HPV transmission through hand-to-genital contact is possible, the majority of genital HPV infections are likely caused by genital-to-genital sexual transmission. Therefore, although hand-to-genital transmission is a potential route for beta HPV, the primary mode of transmission for genital HPV infections is likely through genital-to-genital contact.
What are the long-term effects of glyphosate exposure on human health, particularly in children and pregnant women?
5 answers
Glyphosate exposure poses significant risks to human health, especially in children and pregnant women. Studies indicate that prenatal glyphosate exposure is linked to adverse reproductive outcomes, including lower birth weight percentiles and increased neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Glyphosate's widespread use in agriculture and other applications has led to increased exposure rates for animals and humans, impacting cellular health, microbiome, and nutrient levels. Furthermore, glyphosate is suspected of being mutagenic, carcinogenic, and neurotoxic, with potential long-term health effects on the general population. Research also suggests that glyphosate exposure during pregnancy may shorten gestational length, potentially leading to preterm births. The compound's presence in biological fluids and tissues raises concerns about its genotoxic and cytotoxic effects, including the induction of reactive oxygen species and DNA damage, with implications for inflammation, gene expression, and reproductive health.
How does chronic loneliness and isolation affect an individual's overall health outcomes?
5 answers
Chronic loneliness and isolation significantly impact an individual's overall health outcomes. Research indicates that both chronic loneliness and social isolation are linked to various negative health consequences, including higher mortality risk, poor physical health outcomes, increased rates of cardiovascular disease, dementia, and mental health issues like depression and anxiety. Moreover, individuals experiencing chronic loneliness have a notably higher risk of reporting long-term health conditions, emphasizing the detrimental effects on health. The association between chronic loneliness and social isolation with cardiometabolic diseases and multimorbidity has been highlighted, showcasing the increased risks for these conditions. Addressing chronic loneliness and isolation through targeted interventions is crucial to mitigate these adverse health outcomes and improve overall well-being.
Can mutations be considered a necessary component of evolution?
5 answers
Mutations are indeed a crucial component of evolution. They provide the raw material for adaptation and drive genetic variation, enabling natural selection to act. The relationship between mutation and phenotypic divergence has been demonstrated in studies on Drosophilid fly wings, showing a strong positive correlation between mutation, genetic variation, and evolutionary rate over millions of years. Mutations play a significant role in generating genetic diversity, which is essential for evolutionary processes. The mutational process is highly repeatable and predicts genetic variation, highlighting the importance of mutations in shaping evolutionary trajectories. Therefore, mutations are not only necessary but fundamental to the evolutionary process, providing the variability upon which natural selection acts to drive species adaptation and diversification.
Is vaccination the most effective control against covid?
5 answers
Vaccination is a highly effective control measure against COVID-19, as indicated by various research studies. Studies have shown that vaccination significantly reduces disease transmission,,. The effectiveness of vaccination increases with the number of doses, with third/booster doses providing high protection against hospitalization and death. Additionally, vaccination strategies play a crucial role in controlling COVID-19 surges, with timely booster vaccinations being essential to minimize peak hospitalizations. However, the effectiveness of vaccination can vary across regions, with some areas experiencing better outcomes due to higher vaccination coverage and stringent government measures. Overall, vaccination remains a cornerstone in the global effort to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 and prevent future outbreaks.
What caused COVID?
4 answers
COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease's etiology involves immunopathogenesis, with different stages of infection leading to various manifestations. The exaggerated inflammatory response in COVID-19 is linked to acute phase reactants elevation and abnormal inflammasome activation, resulting in tissue damage and cytokine release. Risk factors for severe illness or death in COVID-19 patients include older age, male gender, and various comorbidities like chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. The mechanisms underlying severe COVID-19 involve virus-driven immune system perturbations, leading to tissue injury and widespread microvascular damage across multiple organ systems. Understanding these causative factors is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies for COVID-19.
What are the current research findings on the link between type 2 diabetes and cancer? using bioinformatics?
5 answers
Current research findings utilizing bioinformatics have revealed a significant association between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cancer. Studies have identified shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in T2DM and various cancers like pancreatic, liver, breast, uterine, lung, and colon cancer. These DEGs are involved in crucial biological pathways such as cell cycle events, immune system processes, and metabolism, indicating a molecular link between T2DM and cancer development. Additionally, the construction of diabetes-based cancer-associated inflammation networks (DCIN) has provided insights into the mechanisms underlying the increased occurrence and progression of tumors in individuals with diabetes. These findings offer potential for the development of new therapeutic strategies and predictive markers for cancer susceptibility in T2DM patients.