Showing papers on "Reciprocal determinism published in 2016"
TL;DR: Classroom environment did not correlate with mathematics achievement once intrapersonal factors and alternative test performance were included in the model, but was associated with subject interest and academic self-concept.
49 citations
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: Theoretical Framework: Social Cognitive Theory 43 Reciprocal Determinism 44 Human Agency 45 Self-efficacy 46 The Evolution of General Teacher Selfefficacy Research as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: 3 Dedication 4 Acknowledgments 5 List of Tables 10 List of Figures 11 List of Abbreviations 12 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 14 Teacher Self-Efficacy: A Powerful Construct Necessitating Further Research 16 Background and Conceptual Framework 19 Problem Statement 24 Purpose Statement 26 Research Question and Hypotheses 27 Identification of Key Variables 32 Definitions 41 Research Summary 42 CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE 43 Theoretical Framework: Social Cognitive Theory 43 Reciprocal Determinism 44 Human Agency 45 Self-efficacy 46 The Evolution of General Teacher Self-efficacy Research 49
9 citations
23 May 2016
TL;DR: The concept of Self-Efficacy was first propounded by Bandura in 1991 as discussed by the authors, which refers to the perception of the ability of individuals to organize and implement actions to display certain skills.
Abstract: learning is a process of change in human personality, and the changes are showed in the form of an increase in the quality and quantity of behaviors such as increased skills, knowledge, attitudes, habits, understanding, skills, mindset, and other capabilities. One of the famous psychologist with the learning theory is Albert Bandura. Bandura is a psychology that greatly contribute to the formation of the child's behavior through learning in the tradition of behaviorists theories and analytical study. A very popular Bandura's theory is a theory of Social Learning, which emphasizes the cognitive components of mind, understanding, and evaluation. Self-Efficacy is one aspect of knowledge about self or self however knowwledge of the most influential in the lives of everyday maanusia. This is due to Self-Efficacy influences the individual owned participated in determining the action to be performed to achieve a goal of including an estimate of the various events that will be encountered. Self-Efficacy is one of the capabilities of the individual settings. The concept of Self-Efficacy was first propounded by Bandura in 1991. Self-Efficacy refers to the perception of the ability of individuals to organize and implement actions to display certain skills. This theory lies in three factors reciprocal determinism, personal factors, behavioral, and environmental influences, which have a positive effect to be implemented in education, in particular the Islamic education. Keywords; Self-Efficacy, Social Learning Theory, Islamic education
3 citations
22 Nov 2016
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a baseline criterion for interpreting the development of adolescent conflict resolution skills, which is based on the reciprocal determinism theory of social learning (SL) developed by Albert Bandura.
Abstract: Albert Bandura (1977 )developed the Social Learning (SL) theory to explain that people learn how to act from each other. They learn through observation, mimicry, and modeling. To explain how adolescent aggression develops he coined the phrase “reciprocal determinism,”meaning a person’s environment affects his behavior and vice versa. Bandura’s theory helps to establish a baseline criterion for interpreting the development of adolescent conflict resolution skills. From the ages of 11 to 14, children begin the early transitional phase of childhood to adulthood. At this time, kids start to experiment with more vibrant forms of self-expression, contemplate different social perspectives, move towards independence as they make self-guided decisions, and regularly question established norms. This point in psychological development leaves children highly impressionable as they absorb the actions of their environment and subsequently use their behavior to alter the environment.
2 citations
01 Jun 2016
TL;DR: In this article, Bandura looked at the existence of personality theories such as; psychoanalysis, emphasized on the strength of unconsciousness and the influence of childhood, and developed with the view that the development of human personality by the social-cognitive theory of learning acquired through observation.
Abstract: The various viewpoints of personality experts apparently caused Albert Bandura to develop his investigation focus in psychology. Through Bandura’s theory developed, the social learning theory or social cognitive more refers to Skinner view about conditioning theory. Bandura looked at the existence of personality theories such as; psychoanalysis, emphasized on the strength of unconsciousness and the influence of childhood. The characteristic theory is too focused on consistency of behavior in various situations. Evolution theory believed that the biological factor would not change. As well as the basic principle of behaviorism theory which regards organism as a controlled side by the rewards and punishments from the environment, he still lacks detail compared by the approach theory he developed more subtle, even significant. It was not because the basic assumption that is owned by this theory that humans have flexibility to learn about different types of behavior in different situation, and humans also have the capacity to control their life. Because according to Bandura, human was the producer and as product of social system. That basic assumption then he developed with the view that the development of human personality by the social-cognitive theory of learning acquired through observation and the existence of self-efficacy
2 citations
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The authors compared the major social learning theories expressed by Bandura and Gewirtz and argued for a synthesis of the two, and examined the importance of this synthesis for the practitioner in the field of educational technology and for mass communication research in general.
Abstract: CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES In the field of social learning there is currently a significant controversy that has direct bearing on mass communication research. The major theorists involved in this controversy are Albert Bandura and Jacob L. Gewirtz, whose explanations of how people learn through observation differ. And, although social learning theory can be discussed and understood apart from the mass media, the modeling effects of the media cannot be fully discussed and understood apart from social learning theory. This paper, then, compares the major social learning theories expressed by Bandura and Gewirtz, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each, argues for a synthesis of the two, and examines the importance of this synthesis for the practitioner in the field of educational technology and for mass communication research in general. Bandura's social learning theory (best stated in Bandura, 1971) maintains that modeling influences operate principally through their informative functions, and that the observer (0) acquires mainly symbolic representations of the observed