scispace - formally typeset
A

Alan C. Bovik

Researcher at University of Texas at Austin

Publications -  872
Citations -  120104

Alan C. Bovik is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Image quality & Video quality. The author has an hindex of 102, co-authored 837 publications receiving 96088 citations. Previous affiliations of Alan C. Bovik include University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign & University of Sydney.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dichotomy between luminance and disparity features at binocular fixations.

TL;DR: Eye tracking experiments on naturalistic stereo images presented through a haploscope found that fixated luminance contrast and luminance gradient are generally higher than randomly selected luminance contrasts and gradient, which agrees with previous literature, but the fixated disparity contrast and disparity gradient are usually lower.

Pixel-by-pixel classification of MFISH images

TL;DR: In this paper, an automatic pixel by pixel classification algorithm for M-FISH images using a Bayes classifier was proposed, which was trained and tested on non-overlapping data sets and an overall classification accuracy of 95% was obtained.

Range Image Quality Assessment by Structural Similarity.

TL;DR: A new quality metric for range images that is based on the multi-scale Structural Similarity (MS-SSIM) Index that operates in a manner to SSIM but allows for special handling of missing data.
Posted Content

SpatioTemporal Feature Integration and Model Fusion for Full Reference Video Quality Assessment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed two improvements to the VMAF framework: SpatioTemporal VMAFs and Ensemble VMsF. Both algorithms exploit efficient temporal video features which are fed into a single or multiple regression models.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

SSIM-optimal linear image restoration

TL;DR: It is shown using these examples that optimizing equalizers for the SSIM index does indeed result in higher perceptual image quality compared to equalizers optimized for the ubiquitous mean squared error (MSE).