We will review some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems. We will cover algorithmic and structural questions. We will touch on newer models, including those related to the WWW.

Random graphs

Most statistical and machine-learning algorithms assume that the data is a random sample drawn from a stationary distribution. Unfortunately, most of the large databases available for mining today violate this assumption. They were gathered over months or years, and the underlying processes generating them changed during this time, sometimes radically. Although a number of algorithms have been proposed for learning time-changing concepts, they generally do not scale well to very large databases. In this paper we propose an efficient algorithm for mining decision trees from continuously-changing data streams, based on the ultra-fast VFDT decision tree learner. This algorithm, called CVFDT, stays current while making the most of old data by growing an alternative subtree whenever an old one becomes questionable, and replacing the old with the new when the new becomes more accurate. CVFDT learns a model which is similar in accuracy to the one that would be learned by reapplying VFDT to a moving window of examples every time a new example arrives, but with O(1) complexity per example, as opposed to O(w), where w is the size of the window. Experiments on a set of large time-changing data streams demonstrate the utility of this approach.

/pdf/mining-time-changing-data-streams-a9kghvc13p.pdf

Mining time-changing data streams

The dynamic and lossy nature of wireless communication poses major challenges to reliable, self-organizing multihop networks. These non-ideal characteristics are more problematic with the primitive, low-power radio transceivers found in sensor networks, and raise new issues that routing protocols must address. Link connectivity statistics should be captured dynamically through an efficient yet adaptive link estimator and routing decisions should exploit such connectivity statistics to achieve reliability. Link status and routing information must be maintained in a neighborhood table with constant space regardless of cell density. We study and evaluate link estimator, neighborhood table management, and reliable routing protocol techniques. We focus on a many-to-one, periodic data collection workload. We narrow the design space through evaluations on large-scale, high-level simulations to 50-node, in-depth empirical experiments. The most effective solution uses a simple time averaged EWMA estimator, frequency based table management, and cost-based routing.

/pdf/taming-the-underlying-challenges-of-reliable-multihop-2e2c4yefix.pdf

Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks

In the data stream scenario, input arrives very rapidly and there is limited memory to store the input. Algorithms have to work with one or few passes over the data, space less than linear in the input size or time significantly less than the input size. In the past few years, a new theory has emerged for reasoning about algorithms that work within these constraints on space, time, and number of passes. Some of the methods rely on metric embeddings, pseudo-random computations, sparse approximation theory and communication complexity. The applications for this scenario include IP network traffic analysis, mining text message streams and processing massive data sets in general. Researchers in Theoretical Computer Science, Databases, IP Networking and Computer Systems are working on the data stream challenges. This article is an overview and survey of data stream algorithmics and is an updated version of [1].

/pdf/data-streams-algorithms-and-applications-5fo85u5tcy.pdf

Data streams: algorithms and applications

Constraint programming is a powerful paradigm for solving combinatorial search problems that draws on a wide range of techniques from artificial intelligence, computer science, databases, programming languages, and operations research. Constraint programming is currently applied with success to many domains, such as scheduling, planning, vehicle routing, configuration, networks, and bioinformatics.

The aim of this handbook is to capture the full breadth and depth of the constraint programming field and to be encyclopedic in its scope and coverage. While there are several excellent books on constraint programming, such books necessarily focus on the main notions and techniques and cannot cover also extensions, applications, and languages. The handbook gives a reasonably complete coverage of all these lines of work, based on constraint programming, so that a reader can have a rather precise idea of the whole field and its potential. Of course each line of work is dealt with in a survey-like style, where some details may be neglected in favor of coverage. However, the extensive bibliography of each chapter will help the interested readers to find suitable sources for the missing details. Each chapter of the handbook is intended to be a self-contained survey of a topic, and is written by one or more authors who are leading researchers in the area.

The intended audience of the handbook is researchers, graduate students, higher-year undergraduates and practitioners who wish to learn about the state-of-the-art in constraint programming. No prior knowledge about the field is necessary to be able to read the chapters and gather useful knowledge. Researchers from other fields should find in this handbook an effective way to learn about constraint programming and to possibly use some of the constraint programming concepts and techniques in their work, thus providing a means for a fruitful cross-fertilization among different research areas.

The handbook is organized in two parts. The first part covers the basic foundations of constraint programming, including the history, the notion of constraint propagation, basic search methods, global constraints, tractability and computational complexity, and important issues in modeling a problem as a constraint problem. The second part covers constraint languages and solver, several useful extensions to the basic framework (such as interval constraints, structured domains, and distributed CSPs), and successful application areas for constraint programming.

- Covers the whole field of constraint programming
- Survey-style chapters
- Five chapters on applications

Table of Contents

Foreword (Ugo Montanari) 
Part I : Foundations
Chapter 1. Introduction (Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, Toby Walsh) 
Chapter 2. Constraint Satisfaction: An Emerging Paradigm (Eugene C. Freuder, Alan K. Mackworth) 
Chapter 3. Constraint Propagation (Christian Bessiere) 
Chapter 4. Backtracking Search Algorithms (Peter van Beek) 
Chapter 5. Local Search Methods (Holger H. Hoos, Edward Tsang) 
Chapter 6. Global Constraints (Willem-Jan van Hoeve, Irit Katriel)
Chapter 7. Tractable Structures for CSPs (Rina Dechter)
Chapter 8. The Complexity of Constraint Languages
(David Cohen, Peter Jeavons) 
Chapter 9. Soft Constraints (Pedro Meseguer, Francesca Rossi, Thomas Schiex) 
Chapter 10. Symmetry in Constraint Programming
(Ian P. Gent, Karen E. Petrie, Jean-Francois Puget)
Chapter 11. Modelling (Barbara M. Smith) 
Part II : Extensions, Languages, and Applications

Chapter 12. Constraint Logic Programming (Kim Marriott, Peter J. Stuckey, Mark Wallace) 
Chapter 13. Constraints in Procedural and Concurrent Languages (Thom Fruehwirth, Laurent Michel, Christian Schulte)
Chapter 14. Finite Domain Constraint Programming Systems (Christian Schulte, Mats Carlsson) 
Chapter 15. Operations Research Methods in Constraint Programming (John Hooker) 
Chapter 16. Continuous and Interval Constraints(Frederic Benhamou, Laurent Granvilliers) 
Chapter 17. Constraints over Structured Domains
(Carmen Gervet) 
Chapter 18. Randomness and Structure (Carla Gomes, Toby Walsh)
Chapter 19. Temporal CSPs (Manolis Koubarakis)
Chapter 20. Distributed Constraint Programming
(Boi Faltings) 
Chapter 21. Uncertainty and Change (Kenneth N. Brown, Ian Miguel)
Chapter 22. Constraint-Based Scheduling and Planning
(Philippe Baptiste, Philippe Laborie, Claude Le Pape, Wim Nuijten)
Chapter 23. Vehicle Routing (Philip Kilby, Paul Shaw) 
Chapter 24. Configuration (Ulrich Junker)
Chapter 25. Constraint Applications in Networks
(Helmut Simonis)
Chapter 26. Bioinformatics and Constraints (Rolf Backofen, David Gilbert)

/pdf/handbook-of-constraint-programming-53srutguo2.pdf

Handbook of Constraint Programming

In the past, parallel algorithms were developed, for the most part, under the assumption that the number of processors is Θ(n) (where n is the size of the input) and that if in practice the actual number was smaller, this could be resolved using Brent’s Lemma to simulate the highly parallel solution on a lower-degree parallel architecture. In this paper, however, we argue that design and implementation issues of algorithms and architectures are significantly different—both in theory and in practice—between computational models with high and low degrees of parallelism. We report an observed gap in the behavior of a parallel architecture depending on the number of processors. This gap appears repeatedly in both empirical cases, when studying practical aspects of architecture design and program implementation as well as in theoretical instances when studying the behaviour of various parallel algorithms. It separates the performance, design and analysis of systems with a sublinear number of processors and systems with linearly many processors. More specifically we observe that systems with either logarithmically many cores or with O(n α ) cores (with α < 1) exhibit a qualitatively different behavior than a system with a linear number of cores on the size of the input, i.e., Θ(n). The evidence we present suggests the existence of a sharp theoretical gap between the classes of problems that can be efficiently parallelized with o(n) processors and with Θ(n) processors unless P = NC.

On the Sublinear Processor Gap for Parallel Architectures

On-line algorithms are usually analyzed using competitive analysis, in which the performance
of on-line algorithm on a sequence is normalized by the performance of the optimal on-line
algorithm on that sequence. In this paper we introduce adaptive/cooperative analysis as an
alternative general framework for the analysis of on-line algorithms. This model gives promising
results when applied to two well known on-line problems, paging and list update. The idea is
to normalize the performance of an on-line algorithm by a measure other than the performance
of the on-line optimal algorithm OPT. We show that in many instances the perform of OPT
on a sequence is a coarse approximation of the difficulty or complexity of a given input. Using
a finer, more natural measure we can separate paging and list update algorithms which were
otherwise undistinguishable under the classical model. This createas a performance hierarchy of
algorithms which better reflects the intuitive relative strengths between them. Lastly, we show
that, surprisingly, certain randomized algorithms which are superior to MTF in the classical
model are not so in the adaptive case. This confirms that the ability of the on-line adaptive
algorithm to ignore pathological worst cases can lead to algorithms that are more efficient in
practice.

/pdf/adaptive-analysis-of-on-line-algorithms-42mzyskkwf.pdf

Adaptive Analysis of On-line Algorithms

We consider the problem of discovering overlapping communities in networks which we model as generalizations of Graph Packing problems with overlap. 
We seek a collection $\mathcal{S}' \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ consisting of at least $k$ sets subject to certain disjointness restrictions. In the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Membership, each element of $\mathcal{U}$ belongs to at most $t$ sets of $\mathcal{S'}$ while in $t$-Overlap each pair of sets in $\mathcal{S'}$ overlaps in at most $t$ elements. Each set of $\mathcal{S}$ has at most $r$ elements. 
Similarly, both of our graph packing problems seek a collection $\mathcal{K}$ of at least $k$ subgraphs in a graph $G$ each isomorphic to a graph $H \in \mathcal{H}$. In $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership, each vertex of $G$ belongs to at most $t$ subgraphs of $\mathcal{K}$ while in $t$-Overlap each pair of subgraphs in $\mathcal{K}$ overlaps in at most $t$ vertices. Each member of $\mathcal{H}$ has at most $r$ vertices and $m$ edges. 
We show NP-Completeness results for all of our packing problems and we give a dichotomy result for the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership problem analogous to the Kirkpatrick and Hell \cite{Kirk78}. We reduce the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Membership to a problem kernel with $O((r+1)^r k^{r})$ elements while we achieve a kernel with $O(r^r k^{r-t-1})$ elements for the $r$-Set Packing with $t$-Overlap. In addition, we reduce the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Membership and its edge version to problem kernels with $O((r+1)^r k^{r})$ and $O((m+1)^{m} k^{m})$ vertices, respectively. On the other hand, we achieve kernels with $O(r^r k^{r-t-1})$ and $O(m^{m} k^{m-t-1})$ vertices for the $\mathcal{H}$-Packing with $t$-Overlap and its edge version, respectively. In all cases, $k$ is the input parameter while $t$, $r$, and $m$ are constants.

Kernelization Algorithms for Packing Problems Allowing Overlaps (Extended Version)

A convex polyhedron $P$ is $k$-equiprojective if all of its orthogonal projections, i.e., shadows, except those parallel to the faces of $P$ are $k$-gon for some fixed value of $k$. Since 1968, it is an open problem to construct all equiprojective polyhedra. Recently, Hasan and Lubiw [CGTA 40(2):148-155, 2008] have given a characterization of equiprojective polyhedra. Based on their characterization, in this paper we discover some new equiprojective polyhedra by cutting and gluing existing polyhedra.

Some New Equiprojective Polyhedra

The silhouette of polyhedra is an important primitive in application areas such as machine vision and computer graphics. In this paper, we study how to select view points of convex polyhedra such that the silhouette satisfies certain properties. Specifically, we give algorithms to find all projections of a convex polyhedron such that a given set of edges, faces and/or vertices appear on the silhouette. We present an algorithm to solve this problem in O(k 2 ) time for k edges. For orthogonal projections, we give an improved algorithm that is fully adaptive in the number l of connected components formed by the edges, and has a time complexity of O(k log k + kl). We then generalize this algorithm to edges and/or faces appearing on the silhouette.

Alejandro López-Ortiz

Papers

On the Sublinear Processor Gap for Parallel Architectures

Adaptive Analysis of On-line Algorithms

Kernelization Algorithms for Packing Problems Allowing Overlaps (Extended Version)

Some New Equiprojective Polyhedra

Efficient view point selection for silhouettes of convex polyhedra