scispace - formally typeset
A

Austin L. Wright

Researcher at University of Chicago

Publications -  38
Citations -  589

Austin L. Wright is an academic researcher from University of Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Public policy. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 31 publications receiving 356 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Poverty and Economic Dislocation Reduce Compliance with COVID-19 Shelter-In-Place Protocols

TL;DR: Novel results on the local impact of the 2020 CARES Act suggest stimulus transfers that addressed economic dislocation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased social distancing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Science Skepticism Reduces Compliance with COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Policies

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the proportion of people who stay at home after lockdown policies go into effect is significantly lower in counties with a high concentration of climate change skeptics, suggesting public health interventions and messaging about risks associated with COVID-19 that take into account local attitudes towards science may be more effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unmasking Partisanship: Polarization Undermines Public Response to Collective Risk

TL;DR: This paper found that mask use is robustly correlated with partisanship, and the impact of partisanship on mask use was not offset by local policy interventions, and that partisanship was the single most important predictor of mask use, not COVID-19 severity or local policies.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Logic of Insurgent Electoral Violence

TL;DR: The authors study insurgent violence during elections using newly declassified microdata on the conflict in Afghanistan and find that violence depresses voting, which suggests insurgents try to depress turnout while avoiding backlash from harming civilians.
Journal ArticleDOI

Border Walls and Smuggling Spillovers

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the impact of a border wall project on smuggling in Israel and find that border fortification may have uneven distributional consequences, creating unintended winners and losers.