B
Bruce Thompson
Researcher at Texas A&M University
Publications - 372
Citations - 22111
Bruce Thompson is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Test validity & Higher education. The author has an hindex of 64, co-authored 371 publications receiving 21056 citations. Previous affiliations of Bruce Thompson include Colorado State University & Baylor College of Medicine.
Papers
More filters
Book
Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the important concepts required for implementing two disciplines of factor analysis -exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with an emphasis on EFA/CFA linkages.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes
TL;DR: In this paper, a Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to investigate the effects on structural equation modeling (SEM) fit indexes of sample size, estimation method, and model specification, and two primary conclusions were suggested: (a) some fit indexes appear to be noncomparable in terms of the information they provide about model fit for misspecified models and (b) estimation method strongly influenced almost all the fit indexes examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines
Bruce Thompson,Larry G. Daniel +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored expectations for reporting factor analysis results as part of construct validation in the context of emerging views of measurement validity, and proposed a short computer program for conducting parallel analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Research in Special Education: Scientific Methods and Evidence-Based Practices
Samuel L. Odom,Ellen Brantlinger,Russell Gersten,Robert H. Horner,Bruce Thompson,Karen R. Harris +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors set the context for the development of research quality indicators and guidelines for evidence of effective practices provided by different methodologies in the context of special education research.
Journal ArticleDOI
What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors review some definitions and issues related to developing confidence intervals for effect sizes and make recommendations for the thoughtful use of such CIs, which are especially valuable because they facilitate meta-analytic thinking and the interpretation of intervals via comparison with the effect intervals from related prior studies.